Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] Document Freedom Day Ends, ISO/Web Derailed by Microsoft Shills

  • Subject: [News] Document Freedom Day Ends, ISO/Web Derailed by Microsoft Shills
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 02:29:36 +0000
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: Freelance
  • User-agent: KNode/0.10.4
[FSFE PR][EN] 26 March 2008: Today is Document Freedom Day

,----[ Quote ]
| Today is Document Freedom Day: Roughly 200 teams from more than 60
| countries worldwide are organising local activities to raise awareness
| for Document Freedom and Open Standards. To support the initiatives
| surrounding the first day to celebrate document liberation, DFD
| starter packs containing a DFD flag, t-shirts and leaflets have been
| sent to the first 100 registered teams over the past weeks.
`----

http://mail.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release/2008q1/000205.html
http://documentfreedom.org/News/20080326

What Microsoft’s track record tells us about OOXML’s future

,----[ Quote ]
| If the discussion on OOXML was purely technical I don’t think there would be 
| much debate. Apart from Microsoft employees and a few lost souls, for whom we 
| can only wonder about their real motivations, I have yet to meet any 
| technical person arguing that OOXML is a good specification.   
`----

http://lehors.wordpress.com/2008/03/25/what-microsofts-track-record-tells-us-about-ooxmls-future/

Seeking Open Standards Activists

,----[ Quote ]
| I'm looking forward to the day, soon, when I can search Google for "open 
| standards activist" and not find a paid Microsoft shill among the listings on 
| the first page.  
`----

http://www.robweir.com/blog/2008/03/seeking-open-standards-activists.html


Related:

Microsoft Tech Ed 2007: OpenXML

,----[ Quote ]
| He was asked "Why did Microsoft push OOXML through the "Fast Track" process 
| instead of the standard ISO process? Wouldn't they get less resistance than 
| faced now?"  
| 
| His response was very frank: "Office is a USD$10 billion revenue generator 
| for the company. When ODF was made an ISO standard, Microsoft had to react 
| quickly as certain governments have procurement policies which prefer ISO 
| standards. Ecma and OASIS are 'international standards', but ISO is the 
| international 'Gold Standard'. Microsoft therefore had to rush this standard 
| through. Its a simple matter of commercial interests!"     
`----            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

http://www.openmalaysiablog.com/2007/09/microsoft-tech-.html


Linux Foundation: Microsoft's OOXML Argument 'Ridiculous'

,----[ Quote ]
| "What I'd love to see is Microsoft adopt the already existing ISO standard," 
| Zemlin says, referring to the OpenDocument Format (ODF) backed by Google and 
| others. "It's akin to Microsoft going to the United States Congress and 
| proposing an alternative bumper heights."   
`----

http://www.crn.com/software/206900276;jsessionid=CIDB0BZULPGHOQSNDLOSKHSCJUNN2JVN


A renewed wish for open document standards

,----[ Quote ]
| Currently, the technology industry is evaluating a proposed ISO standard for 
| document formats. Given the importance of a workable standard, Microsoft's 
| submission of Office Open XML (OOXML ) as an additional international 
| standard has caught the attention of many. In September 2007, the original 
| request to ISO was defeated. After further technical analysis of the 
| specification along with all the additional data available on OOXML, Google 
| believes OOXML would be an insufficient and unnecessary standard, designed 
| purely around the needs of Microsoft Office.       
`----

http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/02/renewed-wish-for-open-document.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index