____/ Ron House on Wednesday 26 March 2008 06:40 : \____
> Tim Smith wrote:
> ...
>> Even before the BRM, OOXML was *way* ahead of ODF in this regard.
>> Here's how ODF handles this:
> ...
>> along with an important observation:
>>
>>> I'll close by repeating that I don't intend this post to be anti-ODF in
>>> anyway. Instead I'm pointing out that there will always be designs that
>>> folks disagree with, and areas for improvement in a standard.
>
> So you quote and call important the statement that the material you are
> using is not anti-ODF but just illustrating a point about standards, and
> you use it as anti-ODF arguments. Stupid twerp.
Ron,
I was sent some E-mails earlier today to show that Microsoft had just started
attacking ODF because it cannot defend OOXML. It's a diversion tactic and the
Microsoft Munchkins play along.
--
~~ Best of wishes
Beware the Windows box spewage (more commonly known as "spam")
http://Schestowitz.com | RHAT GNU/Linux | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
run-level 2 2008-03-19 11:51 last=
http://iuron.com - help build a non-profit search engine
|
|
