-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
What’s wrong at OpenSolaris
,----[ Quote ]
| Notice that? No SPARC support: on an OS product backed by Sun.
|
| And beyond that, what does the curious but uncommitted user see here? an
| illogical “extra” in the first paragraph and a sloppy mistake in the second -
| the package repository isn’t on the OpenOffice site, they’re trying to cite
| an example of what’s available.
|
| Why did this happen? I think it happened for the same reason that companies
| like Red Hat, IBM, and Microsoft have been having a wonderful time spreading
| FUD about the CDDL and the inevitability of some future switch to GPL3: Ian
| Murdock.
`----
http://blogs.zdnet.com/Murphy/?p=1144
Murphy typically raves about Solaris.
OpenSolaris 2008.05, and other places the sun don't shine
,----[ Quote ]
| For the desktop Linux user who is simply curious about UNIX derivatives, we'd
| have to advise taking a pass on this release, anyway. We'd probably tell you
| to check out OpenBSD, or FreeBSD, for a shot at a more successful change of
| pace.
`----
http://www.downloadsquad.com/2008/05/15/opensolaris-2008-05-and-other-places-the-sun-dont-shine/
There was some buzz for a few days, but it's over now.
Recent:
Does OpenSolaris Matter?
,----[ Quote
| I'm not sure.
|
| Sun first announced OpenSolaris in 2005 but they keep finding ways to
| announce 'first releases'. Yesterday was one such release.
`----
http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/2008/05/does-opensolaris-matter.html
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFILXUpU4xAY3RXLo4RAsf3AJ9kC9EQwv1tbJb9+xxY8ZQ2bWINOwCgsMft
x+ZnN4ectF8OpdNc7c42yq4=
=Dwk7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|
