Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] [Rival] Microsoft Exploits Buddies at New York Times for Platform Lock-in

  • Subject: [News] [Rival] Microsoft Exploits Buddies at New York Times for Platform Lock-in
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 14:17:27 +0100
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • User-agent: KNode/0.10.4
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

NY Times readers give thumbs down to Silverlight

,----[ Quote ]
| While the Mac version provides better searching than its Windows sibling 
| (with full text searching over seven days rather then one day of headlines, 
| bylines and article summaries), text flow is not supported so the view is 
| restricted to four pre-set window sizes, and copy and paste are not 
| accessible.    
`----

http://www.itwire.com/content/view/18473/1151/

The XAML infection (Silverblight [sic]) is also a shot at rival browsers, so
antitrust is likely.

Another Online Headache For Microsoft (MSFT): Browser Competition

,----[ Quote ]
| According to The New York Times "With tasks like e-mail and word processing 
| now migrating from the PC to the Internet, analysts and industry players 
| think the browser will soon become even more valuable and strategically 
| important."   
`----

http://www.247wallst.com/2008/05/another-online.html

So why does the New York Times lock out Microsoft's #1 rival then? To prevent
or slow this down? The NTY seems to be the host of plenty of the Windows
7avpouware roadshow at the moment.


Related:

Inadvertently Proving the Opposite by Knocking Down a Strawman [at NYT]

,----[ Quote ]
| I’m not sure who told Mr. Gomes that Ubuntu, for example, has never needed a 
| security update. (If anyone actually did, I respectfully suggest that Mr. 
| Gomes reconsider his use of that source.)  
`----

http://www.oreillynet.com/linux/blog/2007/10/a_very_nice_strawman_about_gnu.html


Microsoft Delivers Major Piece of Nothing; NYT Does It Up Front Page

,----[ Quote ]
| Please. This story is more appropriate for placement in the Times’ Bits blog, 
| if its to be presented anywhere in the folds of the publication. Markoff’s  
| efforts in reporting the latest news in the tech industry would’ve been 
| better spent on another item.  
`----

http://www.profy.com/2007/09/03/microsoft-delivers-major-piece-of-nothing-nyt-does-it-up-front-page/


Windows Live Installer Thingy Coming This Week

,----[ Quote ]
| The NYT calls this a Netscape-level event, meaning it may be as significant 
| as when Microsoft released the first version of Internet Explorer in 1995 and 
| eventually brought Netscape to its knees. “The empire is preparing to strike 
| back — again” writes John Markoff.   
| 
| That seems like a bit of a stretch to me. The important new web services are 
| all browser based, and Microsoft has no competitive advantage over offerings 
| from Google, Yahoo, AOL and thousands of new web startups all trying to move 
| users from away from the desktop.    
`----

http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/windows-live-installer-thingy-coming-this-week/


NY Times bans Microsoft analysts from Microsoft stories

,----[ Quote ]
| The New York Times continues to perplex with its analyst- quoting
| policy. Rather than having analysts declare their ties to clients,
| the paper would prefer to quote analysts that have no experience
| with a client - a protocol which seems to undermine the very point
| of citing analysts.
| 
| The Register this week started pushing the Times to explain its
| quoting stance after noticing that Rob Enderle - the most quoted
| technology analyst on the planet - had been blocked from commenting
| on companies with which he has a financial relationship. The ban
| against Enderle appeared odd, given that Times reporters continue
| to cite analysts from larger firms who also have financial
| relationships with the companies discussed.
| 
| [...]
| 
| Just days after banning Enderle from discussing Microsoft because
| he has Microsoft as a client, the Times quoted Gartner analyst
| Michael Silver and AMR Research analyst Jim Murphy in a story
| about Microsoft's Windows and Office software.
| 
| If the paper would prefer not to quote an analyst who has
| experience with a client, it did a poor job. Silver is Gartner's
| vice president in charge of client computing. Microsoft happens to
| do lots of business with Gartner and also happens to have a
| client-software monopoly. We're guessing that Silver knows
| Microsoft's products well and has direct involvement with the
| company.
| 
| And, sure enough, he appears a number of times on Microsoft's
| own site and thousands of times in stories about Microsoft.
| 
| Jim Murphy - wait for it - covers Microsoft too and is even more
| prolific than Silver.
| 
| [...]
| 
| Part of the problem stems from the reticence of companies such as
| IDC and Gartner to reveal their clients. That should make everyone
| nervous, but it doesn't. So called objective technology publications
| keep publishing material bought by vendors without telling you this.
| They're also too lazy or scared to ignore the likes of Gartner and
| IDC until the firms change their disclosure rules.
| 
| As it turns out, there's a cottage industry devoted to Rob
| Enderle, where Linux zealots fire off this form letter to editors
| whenever Enderle appears talking about Microsoft. Perhaps the Linux
| crowd could put its fabled collective mind toward creating letters
| for all the major analysts. Lord knows, the Times could use
| some help.
`----

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/12/15/nytimes_ms_ban/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFIPVtnU4xAY3RXLo4RApxGAJ0WBc/k6XTu0xrTbuhjzvrCIkf0lwCdGngQ
r6eq22J7Akb7iU1/ijY7sLU=
=CLMh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index