On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 12:38:14 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> After takin' a swig o' grog, Sandeep Kumar belched out
> this bit o' wisdom:
>
>> On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 02:14:30 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> No more Microsoft Internet Explorer for the 2010 soccer world cup
>>>
>>> ,----[ Quote ]
>>>| The only web browsers gaining more market share by 2010 is everything except
>>>| Internet Explorer, with Mozilla Firefox leading the pack.
>> How many machines will be running firefox with Windows though?
>
> Probably a very noticeable percentage.
>
>> The target should be Windows not internet Explorer.
>
> You mean as in "the browser that is inextricably embedded in Windows".
>
>> If it were not for Windows firefox would not have nearly the installed
>> base that it currently has.
>
> Some logic. Let's write to "Windows", and not to the "web standards"
> implemented by a popular third-party browser.
I apologize for not being clear.By target I meant that Linux should target
Windows instead of firefox not that websites should code for Windows.Using
firefox as an example of oss programming being successful is flawed because
the vast majority are using it as a Windows browser not a Linux version.
|
|
