Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: The Super Windows That...Couldn't

Hash: SHA1

____/ Chris Ahlstrom on Wednesday 19 November 2008 00:38 : \____

> After takin' a swig o' grog, Kelsey Bjarnason belched out
>   this bit o' wisdom:
>> On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:59:44 -0800, nessuno@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>> <Quote>
>>> Five years ago, the GNU/Linux family ran 36.80% of the top 500
>>> supercomputers; worse, Windows ran on precisely one supercomputer.
>>> Obviously, this was somewhat embarrassing for the company, which has
>>> poured huge sums into beefing up its Windows HPC operating system for
>>> use on supercomputers. And all that money has produced some stunning
>>> results. Compared to five years ago, Windows has increased its share of
>>> the top 500 supercomputing site by a staggering 400% - that's right,
>>> it's gone from one machine, to five - 1%. Meanwhile, GNU/Linux has grown
>>> less impressively: it's only increased its share of the market by 51% in
>>> absolute terms, growing from 36.8% to 87.8%.
>>> Now, what was that about it not scaling...? </Quote>
>> Wait... that means Windows had a 400% increase in market share, while
>> Linux only had 51%, so Windows is doing 8 times better!
>> You just have to know how to spin it, you see.
> I want to see bbgruff's latest Linux second-derivatives!

Where is he anyway? I think he's in GL sometimes.

- -- 
                ~~ Best of wishes

Roy S. Schestowitz      |    make install -not war
http://Schestowitz.com  |  Open Prospects   |     PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Tasks: 140 total,   1 running, 139 sleeping,   0 stopped,   0 zombie
      http://iuron.com - knowledge engine, not a search engine
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index