-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
____/ Peter Köhlmann on Saturday 01 November 2008 23:34 : \____
> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> ____/ Michael B. Trausch on Saturday 01 November 2008 16:17 : \____
>>
>>> On Sat, 1 Nov 2008 09:06:02 -0400
>>> Chris Ahlstrom <linonut@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> It does look interesting. Thanks, Mike!
>>>
>>> I'll be interested in checking it out when it's included in the
>>> mainline kernel even in the staging area. I reserved some space to
>>> tinker with it to see what I think of it.
>>>
>>> Though, I think "butterfs" is probably not the best name in the world.
>>> Makes me think "butter fingers," which really isn't something I'd want
>>> to associate with a filesystem... but we'll see how it actually does.
>>> After all, judging a book on its cover isn't a good thing... :-)
>>>
>>> --- Mike
>>
>> Reiserfs is toast,
>
> Nope
> It is still the best choice if you have lots of relativly small files
>
>> pass over the butterfs.
>
> Why? Is there anything wrong with EXT3?
> And since EXT4 is easily outperforming EXT3,XFS and BTRFS, I would use that
> one instead
I was only joking (toast and butter). Reiserfs is actually still maintained.
- --
~~ Best of wishes
Microsoft loves competition.
"We need to slaughter Novell before they get stronger….If you’re going to kill
someone, there isn’t much reason to get all worked up about it and angry. You
just pull the trigger. Any discussions beforehand are a waste of time. We need
to smile at Novell while we pull the trigger."
--Jim Allchin, Platform Group Vice President
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkkNGxgACgkQU4xAY3RXLo4MIwCeMgZ7n3Zt1C4nPv9K5uQspmpu
58QAoKCcNGYLPTtvrYzGamG94JdM+Sis
=WPjn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|
