-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
A Better File System for Linux?
,----[ Quote ]
| BTRFS (pronounced better FS) is currently under development in an effort led
| by Oracle engineer Chris Mason. With the support of Intel(NASDAQ: INTC), Red
| Hat (NYSE: RHT), HP (NYSE: HPQ), IBM (NYSE: IBM), BTRFS could become the
| engine that brings next generation filesystem capabilities to Linux.
|
| "The main goal is to let it {Linux} scale for the storage that will be
| available," Chris Mason Director of Linux Kernel Engineering at Oracle told
| InternetNews.com. "Scaling is not just about addressing the storage but also
| means being able to administer and to manage it with a clean interface that
| lets people see what's being used and makes it more reliable."
`----
http://www.internetnews.com/dev-news/article.php/3781676/A+Better+File+System+for+Linux.htm
Recent:
Btrfs 0.16, Improved Scalability And Performance
,----[ Quote ]
| "Btrfs v0.16 is available for download," began Chris Mason, announcing the
| latest release of his new Btrfs filesystem. He noted, "v0.16 has a shiny new
| disk format, and is not compatible with filesystems created by older Btrfs
| releases. But, it should be the fastest Btrfs yet, with a wide variety of
| scalability fixes and new features." Improved scalability and performance
| improvements include fine grained btree locking, pushing CPU intensive
| operations such as checksumming into their own background threads, improved
| data=ordered mode, and a new cache to reduce IO requirements when cleaning up
| old transactions.
`----
http://kerneltrap.org/Linux/Btrfs_0.16_Improved_Scalability_And_Performance
Related:
Btrfs 0.12, Performance Improvements
,----[ Quote ]
| Btrfs was first announced in June of 2007, as an alpha-quality filesystem
| offering checksumming of all files and metadata, extent based file storage,
| efficient packing of small files, dynamic inode allocation, writable
| snapshots, object level mirroring and striping, and fast offline filesystem
| checks, among other features. The project's website explains, "Linux has a
| wealth of filesystems to choose from, but we are facing a number of
| challenges with scaling to the large storage subsystems that are becoming
| common in today's data centers. Filesystems need to scale in their ability to
| address and manage large storage, and also in their ability to detect, repair
| and tolerate errors in the data stored on disk."
`----
http://kerneltrap.org/Linux/Btrfs_0.12_Performance_Improvements
Kernel space: a better btrfs
,----[ Quote ]
| A powerful new filesystem for Linux already supports fast snapshots,
| checksums for all data, and online resizing--and plans to add ZFS-style
| built-in striping and mirroring.
`----
http://www.linuxworld.com/news/2008/012208-kernel.html?fsrc=rss-linux-news
Btrfs Online Resizing, Ext3 Conversion, and More
,----[ Quote ]
| Chris Mason announced version 0.10 of his new Btrfs filesystem, listing the
| following new features, "explicit back references, online resizing (including
| shrinking), in place conversion from Ext3 to Btrfs, data=ordered support,
| mount options to disable data COW and checksumming, and barrier support for
| sata and IDE drives".
`----
http://kerneltrap.org/Linux/Btrfs_Online_Resizing_Ext3_Conversion_and_More
Linux: Btrfs, File Data and Metadata Checksums
,----[ Quote ]
| Chris Mason announced an early alpha release of his new Btrfs
| filesystem, "after the last FS summit, I started working on a new
| filesystem that maintains checksums of all file data and metadata." He
| listed the following features as "mostly implemented": "extent based file
| storage (2^64 max file size), space efficient packing of small files,
| space efficient indexed directories, dynamic inode allocation, writable
| snapshots, subvolumes (separate internal filesystem roots), checksums on
| data and metadata (multiple algorithms available), very fast offline
| filesystem check".
`----
http://kerneltrap.org/node/8376
Interview: Chris Mason about Btrfs
,----[ Quote ]
| Q: Several people might be interested what you think about ZFS, why you see a
| need for Btrfs “despite of ZFS” (some people think ZFS is the solution for
| everything for them).
|
| Well, the short answer is that for Linux, there is no ZFS. I know about
| the FUSE port, but that isn’t a long term solution in terms of
| performance or enterprise workloads. ZFS has an impressive list of
| features (and clearly many happy users), but the real competition for
| Btrfs is other Linux filesystems.
`----
http://liquidat.wordpress.com/2007/08/07/interview-chris-mason-about-btrfs/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkkKUmYACgkQU4xAY3RXLo4BCACgiAAN1tawvihxMyUxX8PbQ1bB
Oa8AnAhEEHUSo+8VQoLvLr4+8UusFiTi
=8FmE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|