On Wed, 08 Oct 2008 20:09:30 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> ____/ William Poaster on Wednesday 08 October 2008 17:41 : \____
>
>> On Wed, 08 Oct 2008 11:55:39 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>
>>> After takin' a swig o' grog, Andrew Halliwell belched out
>>> this bit o' wisdom:
>>>
>>>> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> He did a selective snipping work to present this out of context and
>>>>> daemonise.
>>>>
>>>> Of course he did. We wouldn't expect any different from the likes of
>>>> hardon.
>>>
>>> I wonder who Hadron's buddy was who sent him the revelatory e-mail.
>>>
>>> And why that person considered Hadron to be someone with a
>>> "need-to-know".
>>>
>>> Could it be that Hadron is part of a "cabal" even more sinister than the
>>> Linux "cabal"? Could it be that Hadron has his own "master" for whom he
>>> is a "lap dog"? Or is Hadron actually in the "master" hierarchy, with
>>> his own "minions" and "lap dogs" "feeding" him "doggie-drops" of
>>> "intelligence", which Hadron then feeds to his "master"? And where does
>>> "Moshe" fit in the "hierarchy"? Did "he" send Hadron this mysterious
>>> e-mail, with a "command" to "forward it to COLA"? "We must neutralize
>>> this Roy Schestowitz... persona ... and render him ineffective, perhaps
>>> even turn him to our purpose. Muuuuuah-ha-ha-ha-ha."
>>>
>>> <laughing>
>>
>> Maybe the thread should be retitled: Hardon Quack & his loony email army! ;-)
>
> There is a Microsoft consultant who goes by the name 'cj' and always lurks in
> the IRC channel. He's trying to do the "let's engage in a conversation"
> routine and informs other people in the world of Mono and Microsoft('s open
> source hijack) what's happening, based on his actions.
Yes, I know about the 'cj' shill.
> Microsoft has an extensive network of that type of s*it.
>
> Brcve Perens, a few days ago:
>
> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=985543&cid=25267133
>
> "[J]ust about every PR firm offers to help “manage the perception of your
> company in online communities” these days. What do you think that means?
> Astroturfing Slashdot, Youtube, etc. In my various manangement positions it’s
> been offered to me. Indeed, some of the companies offer to create negative
> publicity for your competition that way - HP had a publicity firm for its
> Linux activities that told us it would do that when we wanted. I never asked
> them to do so and hope nobody else did either.
>
> This stuff is just standard these days. You’ve got to expect it."
>
> He also wrote:
>
> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=985543&cid=25256649
>
> I think mostly they’d like to dilute “Open Source” to mean any code with
> source code. This is important to them because it’s the rights connected to
> Open Source that scare Microsoft (and others). If you can call it Open Source
> when there isn’t even the right to compile the code, or to use the information
> you get from reading it, customers don’t have a reason to ask for it any
> longer.
>
> Their publicity agencies are here on Slashdot pumping that angle every day.
>
>
> Just KF the Microsoft shills. They are a waste of time, they should be in jail,
> but they only commit a crime if they operate from the EU, if I understand the
> new law correctly.
I believe that is correct.
> - --
> ~~ Best of wishes
>
> Roy S. Schestowitz | "These characters were randomly picked"
> http://Schestowitz.com | RHAT Linux | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
> 20:05:01 up 2 days, 8:56, 1 user, load average: 0.48, 0.72, 0.78
> http://iuron.com - Open Source knowledge engine project
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkjtE3oACgkQU4xAY3RXLo4/5wCcC8bemDdYGmNKRuWsxMU1NB0R
> btwAn1w8KVhMbgTQRBawEvGeOD9vLzWT
> =Lmd9
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|
