Hadron wrote:
> Kelsey Bjarnason <kelseyb@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> On Mon, 06 Oct 2008 20:59:58 +0200, Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>>
>>> Hadron wrote:
>>>
>>>> Kelsey Bjarnason <kelseyb@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> [snips]
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 06 Oct 2008 09:19:32 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hotmail still riddled with spam
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ,----[ Quote ]
>>>>>> | Microsoft has admitted that up to 98 per cent of messages sent to |
>>>>>> Hotmail addresses are spam.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah, but about 98% of *all* email traffic these days is spam. That's
>>>>> not a Hotmail problem, particularly, though we can lay most of the
>>>>> blame on MS in general, for their crappy methods of keeping
>>>>> spam-spewing bots off users' computers.
>>>>
>>>> Are you two loonies now blaming MS for what gets sent TO a hotmail
>>>> account?
>>>>
>>>> Are you mad?
>>>
>>> Well, you have *one* guess what OS those spamming machines run
>>
>> He's not too bright, is he? Apparently he's not yet managed to figure
>> out which popular OS has the highest incidence of infections resulting in
>> spam bots - despite this being common knowledge for years.
>
> Apparently you can not read either. Read what I types, not what you
> imagine is there.
Heed your own advice now and then, Hadron Quark.
Your MO is to totally misread what was written
> Christ on a bike Kelsey you one sub IQ tape monkey.
Well, Hadron, pray tell: What OS, shitty beyond imagination, is responsible
for that incredible amount of spam?
--
The Day Microsoft makes something that does not suck is probably
the day they start making vacuum cleaners.
|
|
