Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: [News] Novell and Microsoft Are Poisoning OpenOffice.org

____/ Linonut on Sunday 14 September 2008 14:27 : \____

> * Tim Smith peremptorily fired off this memo:
> 
>> In article <1837585.e2cNdtANZD@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>>  Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> 
>>> ,----[ Quote ]
>>> | # rpm -i --force openoffice.org-common-3.0svn13475-1mdv2009.0.i586.rpm
>>> | # 2>&1
>>> | | 
>>> | grep mono
>>> |         libmono.so.0 is needed by
>>> |         openoffice.org-common-3.0svn13475-1mdv2009.0.i586
>>> |         mono(mscorlib) = 1.0.5000.0 is needed by
>>> |         openoffice.org-common-3.0svn13475-1mdv2009.0.i586
>>> |         mono(mscorlib) = 2.0.0.0 is needed by
>>> |         openoffice.org-common-3.0svn13475-1mdv2009.0.i586
>>> `----
>>> 
>>>
http://beranger.org/index.php?page=diary&2008/09/12/06/09/30-defeated-the-common-sense-by-man
>>
>> If you read the author's remarks in the comments there, they are
>> interesting.  He would have a similar objection if OO required Perl, or
>> Python, or pretty much anything else (including QT or GTK+).  He seems
>> to think it should be a pure C or C++ program, using no libraries other
>> than the lowest level system libraries and the lowest level X libraries.
> 
> In any case, if you apply ldd to every component in Debian's install of
> openoffice, in /usr/lib/openoffice/program, there aren't any
> dependencies on a mono library.
> 
> While no where near conclusive (there are openoffice gnome and evolution
> debs in my /var/cache/apt/archives that need to be examined), it looks
> more like a packaging mistake.
> 
> Anyway, Tim, you may be mischaracterizing his opinion:
> 
>    So, in order to use a future OpenOffice.org 5.0, we should prepare to
>    be REQUIRED to have installed on our distro of choice: Qt3, Qt4, Qt5,
>    GTK+ 2.x, GTK+ 3.0, Mono, Perl, Awk, Python, LISP, CAML, Pike, Lua,
>    FOX Toolkit, ncurses, and 5,764 libraries and system utilities. Just
>    to be able to use an office suite. Because, you know, this is
>    progress, so why should this be a problem?

It's a packaging mistake and Mandriva is now aware of this.

http://boycottnovell.com/2008/09/13/microsoft-admitted-mono-trap/

-- 
                ~~ Best of wishes

"I don’t understand how IE is going to win. The current path is simply to copy
everything that Netscape does packaging and product wise."
                --Jim Allchin, Microsoft
http://Schestowitz.com  |    RHAT Linux     |     PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
 17:05:01 up 5 days, 11:00,  1 user,  load average: 1.03, 0.99, 0.89
      http://iuron.com - Open Source knowledge engine project

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index