Subway steel wrote:
>So unless home users are typically using multi-terabyte databases then what
>is the point of having a 64-bit OS. For general purpose computing it's going
>to be about 5-10% slower and it's going to take more memory. I don't see how
>a 64-bit OS (any 64-bit OS) is more "sensible" for desktop computing needs
Unless it's Visduh, for which 2G is about the minimum decent
configuration, making 4G a very reasonable configuration...
--
"Linux is currently going nowhere on the desktop." - "True Linux
advocate" Hadron Quark
|
|
