Roy Schestowitz wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Suse Linux virtualized on Windows--why?
>
> ,----[ Quote ]
> | As Suse Linux fades further from any relevance outside of Microsoft, and
> | Red Hat and Sun make huge strides in virtualization, Novell plans to
> | offer support for Suse running on Windows. Is there meaning here or is
> | Novell just becoming more of a Microsoft puppet?
> `----
>
> http://news.cnet.com/8301-13846_3-10039172-62.html
SuSE should have forked a long time ago.
No venture capital company would refuse funding if enough staff
got together and defected to create a micoshaft infection free version of
SuSE.
Micoshaftees and novel shaftees probably have all the SuSE key staff
pinned down in meetings and writing proposals (that ain't going
anywere) keeping them in hope of better times.
The better times are not coming.
Its face reality and defect now.
|
|
