On 2009-04-28, JEDIDIAH <jedi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> claimed:
> On 2009-04-27, Doctor Smith <iaintgotnostinkinemail@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 20:49:48 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> Jaunty Jackalope: Are Alarm Bells Ringing in Redmond?
>>
>> More like "joy bells a ring'n"
>> Ubuntu 9.04 is a bug riddled mess according to the USERS not the people
>> writing advertising copy, like "Linux Insider".
>
> ...as if you have any clue about any real users: Windows, Ubuntu or otherwise.
Dr. Flatso seeems to have missed the couple of posts I made about 9.04.
So here it is again in a nutshell.
I installed 9.04 beta on this netbook. It worked a whole bunch better
than Eeebuntu 2.0 (which worked fine itself, except it had a few slow
moments). When it came time to upgrade, I did nothing out of the
ordinary. IOW, I was getting updates daily, and I continued to get
updates daily. I'm now at a full Ubuntu 9.04 release, and I've had nary
a problem with it since it was installed as a beta.
Now, Flatti. That's from someone you sort of know, someone you can guage
at least some level of experience. It's not from a search of a website
or google, with links that have a boatload of people for whom you have
zero knowledge of their experience or capability.
Not that I expect it will make you change your tune. Trolls don't
change in the face of facts, they ignore the facts and go on trolling.
But at least it's one more post to help overcome the onslaught of
FUDdery by you and the DuFuS/Qook twins.
--
----------------------------------------------------------------
After all is said and done, usually more is said.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Eee PC900 16G SSD 2G RAM Ubuntu 9.04
----------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
