Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] Engineers Calls to Stage Protests Against Intellectual Monopolies

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Suggestion: Engineers Go On A Patent Strike

,----[ Quote ]
| Basically, his argument is that most engineers recognize how harmful the 
| patent system is, but are pushed into patenting by lawyers and management, 
| and the only way to get the message out is to stop assisting with anything 
| having to do with patents.    
`----

http://techdirt.com/articles/20090421/0338254593.shtml

IPR Bill Regulations promulgated - the death knell for open science in South
Africa?

,----[ Quote ]
| The Department of Science and Technology has published the Regulations for 
| the implementation of the IPR Act of 2008. These have serious implications 
| for researchers and the universities and research institutions they work in 
| and even more dire implications for open access and open innovation in South 
| Africa.    
| 
| I set out below my preliminary reading of what these Regulations might mean. 
`----

http://blogs.uct.ac.za/blog/gray-area/2009/04/21/ipr-bill-regulations

Conference on "Make software patents work for SMEs"

,----[ Quote ]
| The European Commission is organising a conference dedicated to "Make IPR 
| work for SMEs" next Monday in Brussels. You can submit your questions by 
| email to me for next Monday on how to "Make software patents work for SMEs". 
| I might be interested to submit them.   
`----

http://stopsoftwarepatents.org/forum/t-150656/conference-on-make-software-patents-work-for-smes

Parasitical lawyers for the most part...


Recent:

Time to rethink intellectual property laws?

,----[ Quote ]
| Conversely, there is widespread anecdotal evidence that the act created a
| mind-set among many researchers that their knowledge represents a potential
| goldmine not to be shared with potential competitors (i.e. those working in
| other universities) - at least until it has been protected by a patent
| application.
|
| Similarly, the act has led to a flood of “upstream” patents on basic
| scientific knowledge, leading to what some commentators describe as a
| virtually impenetrable “patent thicket” blocking small-scale inventors from
| marketing their products. For example, restrictive software patents limit
| further development and commercialisation in the field of information
| technology.
`----

http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=8543&page=1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAknvsoIACgkQU4xAY3RXLo5/egCgll3UALhHKEq2JNiNrNGfLF89
Q2oAnicPur3QPy6CeFUEuhft91NYAZuG
=rvDU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index