After takin' a swig o' grog, forest.jas@xxxxxxxxx belched out
this bit o' wisdom:
> On Apr 12, 8:08 am, Hadron <hadronqu...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstr...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> >>http://washingtontimes.com/news/2009/apr/06/kellner-microsofts-vista-...
>>
>> > Nice animated "lip plumpers" ad. Yeesh.
>>
>> I bet you're so jealous he Creepy?
Imbibing again, Hadrunk?
>> And did he try Linux to find the video driver did not work or that 64
>> bit flash is "alpha" or that .. etc etc. All biased reporting once more.
So far, I've had no trouble with 64-bit Flash.
I'm quite surprised... usually it's the proprietary companies that don't get
along with Linux.
> the QA was done in the field. vista should have been called beta
> vista. multithreading through, bios, to OS and then finally api, or
> any of those in any order as they exist in the design of this security
> nightmare-like oS_BetaShit
>
> yeah maybs it'll run on a system that can run 3 versions
> simultaneously.
>
> the only system out there worth running is free bsd. omniAaa-tuu
Man, I'll have to try FreeBSD again.
That's the trouble with open source -- it's like being a kid in a ginoromous
5-kilometer-long candy store!
--
Today is National Existential Ennui Awareness Day.
|
|
