-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Linux v2.6.29-rc5
,----[ Quote ]
| All the rest is pretty much a collection of trivial small fixes. Yes,
| there's a Intel SVDO update that shows up in diffstat, but the rest
| really is pretty tiny.
`----
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/2/13/346
Recent:
Linux 2.6.29-rc3
,----[ Quote ]
| It's out there, and while it's a bit larger than I'd wish for, that size
| is pretty understandable considering that it's closer to two weeks than
| one in between -rc2 and -rc3 (due to LCA, obviously).
|
| And it isn't really _that_ big: part of the reason it looks bigger as a
| traditional patch (which is what I upload when I upload patches) than it
| really is due to a lot of m68k include file renames, so if you look at the
| git rename-aware patches it all actually looks much smaller.
`----
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/28/277
Initial ext3 vs ext4 Results
,----[ Quote ]
| We’ve started to do some internal benchmarking of ext3 vs ext4 at
| myYearbook.com to see if what we’ve seen and heard about ext4 was really
| true. While the following benchmark is not in-depth, it does represent our
| initial findings, which match our anecdotal findings. If all of these
| findings hold true, we expect them to have a large impact on our PostgreSQL
| OLTP workload where machines are IO bound.
`----
http://gmrpgsql.tumblr.com/post/73798984/initial-ext3-vs-ext4-results
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkmXdboACgkQU4xAY3RXLo6H8gCaAirOx8/q8xahL0ciZAtXwyuG
7RsAnRhIZ/cwtxUTZVXPvt41D+sGalI7
=3P9Q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|
