Peter Köhlmann wrote:
Sermo Malifer wrote:
Peter Köhlmann wrote:
Sermo Malifer wrote:
Roy Schestowitz wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
____/ High Plains Thumper on Thursday 05 February 2009 13:55 : \____
Matt wrote:
Roy Schestowitz wrote:
<snip>
Not to mention the fact that Windows does not have a centralised
patching mechanism. <snip>
That's not a fact, it's an outright lie. Windows has automatic
downloading and patching from a central store.
For the OS itself and a few selected MS apps.
Yes.
Ah, so we agree here
Not even all MS apps are included.
That's not true.
Fine. Show us the link where *all* MS apps are included with "windows
update"
I have no need to do so, for even if I'm wrong about that, it doesn't
make Roy's statement "Not to mention the fact that Windows does not have
a centralised patching mechanism" true.
*No* third party apps are included
Even if that were true, it's dragging the goalposts from "Windows does
not have a centralised patching mechanism."
It is true.
No it's not.
And please show us where only MS apps (and only a select
subset of those) are eligible for "universal patching"
Since about everyone has apps from different vendors installed (on a
typical windows install), they would benefit greatly from a "centralised
patching mechanism". Yet that does not exist at all. It exists only for a
subset of MS apps
You contradict yourself above. It can not both "not exist at all," and
also exist "only for a subset of MS apps."
So yes, it is a fact.
No, that's a lie told to cover Roy's lie.
You have shown nothing so far to substantiate your claim
This post and this thread prove you wrong.
Your hatred of Windows, Microsoft, and Bill Gates is not a license to
lie about them.
He didn't
Yes he did, and it's easily verified that both you and he are wrong.
Good. Since it is "easily verified " you will now supply the links, right?
Riiiight?
You have only to read this post and this thread. You've done all
that's needed to prove both of you liars.
|
|
