Roy Schestowitz wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> ____/ Homer on Tuesday 03 February 2009 01:15 : \____
>
>>
>>
>> Verily I say unto thee, that 7 spake thusly:
>>> How come the asstroturfers are being allowed to post without tbe nntp
>>> posting host address???
>>>
>>> How does one discover the nntp ip address of a header like this?
>>
>> The NNTP-Posting-Host header is not included by Bell South, who instead
>> provide an encrypted X-Trace header to protect the poster's privacy.
>>
>> You'll likely never obtain that IP address, but you can LART the poster,
>> as instructed in the headers:
>>
>>> abuse@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Ah.. so that's the skeleton's E-mail address.
>
> "We'll be right back withcha!
>
>>> X-Abuse-Info: Please forward a copy of all headers for proper
>>> handling
>>> X-Trace:
>>>
>
bhmkggakljkaanefdbdpiflmbcekedmfhojhikkbagflhcbojoklgbgpeapmhpcnbkajhcbjoljopbeodibmgiagfdidobilihbihliohechmkebaojnmoffkkhjjlkbioaihdpcikpmejlpjccjmfdnpmfhcife
>>
>
> - --
> ~~ Best of wishes
>
> Steve Ballmer is even monkier than his moniker suggests
> http://Schestowitz.com | RHAT GNU/Linux | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
> 02:00:01 up 11 days, 10:46, 2 users, load average: 0.81, 0.86, 1.02
> http://iuron.com - help build a non-profit search engine
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkmHpXkACgkQU4xAY3RXLo7qagCfYMCBFGUvlRQNHHiHz6+r/455
> 23gAoICtglrQl1jacHtpj0NSOwvNT0ej
> =KL4p
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
the real problem is that Bellsouth (AT&T) does not handle abuse issues at
all. in fact, a lot of their ip's are listed in quite a few DNSBL's
any complaints sent to them just usually get binned without no response.
|
|
