Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] Study in Nature Shows Why Intellectual Monopolies Are Bad

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Patents versus patenting: implications of intellectual property protection for
biological research

,----[ Quote ]
| Abstract
| 
| A new survey shows scientists consider the proliferation of intellectual 
| property protection to have a strongly negative effect on research. 
| 
| Introduction
| 
| A system of intellectual property (IP) rights can encourage inventions by 
| scientists and help promote the transformation of research achievements into 
| marketed products. But associated restrictions on access can reduce 
| utilization of inventions by other scientists. How is this trade-off working 
| out in practice?    
`----

http://www.nature.com/nbt/journal/v27/n1/full/nbt0109-36.html

A Patent-Holding Software Engineer Explains Why Software Patents Harm
Innovation

,----[ Quote ]
| It's no surprise that many technologists and engineers dislike software 
| patents -- even as their company's execs and lawyers push them to get more 
| patents. Stephen Kinsella highlights an anonymous comment from a software 
| engineer who clearly works for IBM (though he doesn't come out and say that 
| directly), where he explains how IBM actively encourage engineers to file for 
| as many patents as possible (it rewards them with monetary bonuses).      
`----

http://techdirt.com/articles/20090119/1449403453.shtml

Patent Trolls Are a Symptom of Deeper Problems

,----[ Quote ]
| The reason patent trolling is so profitable is that over the last quarter 
| century the courts have expanded patenting into new areas like software and 
| business methods, and dramatically lowered the bar for receiving a patent. As 
| a result, patents that would have been rejected 30 years ago (like this 
| ridiculous patent on removing white space from database entries, which IBM 
| received earlier this month) are now routinely approved by the Patent Office. 
| As a result, patent trolls are able to buy up low-quality patents by the 
| truckload. Even though the vast majority of the patents won’t survive legal 
| challenges, defendants can’t take the chance that one of them might survive 
| and force the firm into a 8- or 9-figure settlement.         
| 
| Patent trolls make good poster children for the patent system’s dysfunctions, 
| but focusing too much on them ignores the fact that abusing the patent system 
| is a game played by large companies as well. For example, Verizon managed to 
| extort tens of millions of dollars from Vonage to settle a lawsuit over an 
| absurdly broad Internet telephony patent. Verizon, of course, isn’t a “patent 
| troll,” but a competitor interested in hobbling an up-and-coming competitor. 
| Any patent reform needs to address the Verizons of the world too, not just 
| the NTPs.       
`----

http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/2009/01/17/patent-trolls-are-a-symptom-of-deeper-problems/


Recent:

Patent system 'stifling science'

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/7632318.stm


What Can We Do To Help?

http://linuxlock.blogspot.com/2008/09/what-can-we-do-to-help.html


Related:

Patents Over Patients

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/01/opinion/01moss.html?_r=1&oref=slogin


Open Source Pharmaceuticals - New Business Model

http://www.farmavita.net/content/view/336/51/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkl5SoQACgkQU4xAY3RXLo7KxACgkuPmvUPzawnopMjz3fpRvRcT
78IAn1qPsCT7LC9hwvNkvc6LpYpr6wnh
=Qn+x
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index