Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] Badmouthing Patents in TACD IP, IBM Builds Bubble

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Liveblog: TACD IP: Patents and Innovation

http://www.gavinbaker.com/2009/01/12/liveblog-tacd-ip-patents-and-innovation/

Liveblog: TACD IP: Patent Reform

http://www.gavinbaker.com/2009/01/13/liveblog-tacd-ip-patent-reform/

Big Blue tops US patent grubber list

,----[ Quote ]
| For the 16th year in a row, IBM has topped the annual list of patent-happy 
| American tech companies. The list tanks high-tech vendors by the number of 
| patents they were awarded in the United States over the previous year.  
`----

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/01/14/2008_us_patent_count/


Recent:

IBM spells out position on business method patents in IAM exclusive

,----[ Quote ]
| IBM filed an amicus brief in Bilski arguing for a principled approach based
| on the precedents of the Supreme Court. IBM’s test would limit the scope of
| patentable subject matter to avoid granting exclusive rights to
| non-technological business methods while broadly allowing for protection of
| new technological advances. Under IBM’s proposed test, a patentable process
| must either (1) be tied to a particular machine or apparatus, or (2) cause
| transformation or reduction of an article to a different state or thing, and
| in either instance produce technologically beneficial results. IBM’s approach
| is not only consistent with the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court, it is
| also substantially consistent with prevailing international standards, \
| including those of the EPO and its member states.
`----

http://www.iam-magazine.com/blog/Detail.aspx?g=b71c3d0c-ddb1-4381-af15-778386e75686


Related:

Intellectual Property Regime Stifles Science and Innovation, Nobel Laureates
Say

,----[ Quote ]
| Patent monopolies are believed to drive innovation but they actually impede
| the pace of science and innovation, Stiglitz said. The current “patent
| thicket,” in which anyone who writes a successful software programme is sued
| for alleged patent infringement, highlights the current IP system’s failure
| to encourage innovation, he said.
|
| Another problem is that the social returns from innovation do not accord with
| the private returns associated with the patent system, Stiglitz said. The
| marginal benefit from innovation is that an idea may become available sooner
| than it might have. But the person who secures the patent on it wins a
| long-term monopoly, creating a gap between private and social returns.
`----

http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=1129
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAklv860ACgkQU4xAY3RXLo6psQCcCU2zj5zW5uJ7u7inYXpv4toS
qKQAnA5srZZSEdMoIOQjbwbtZSK3w/m1
=KV05
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index