Hadron wrote:
> Tim Smith <reply_in_group@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> In article <slrnh759r2.bt2.ZekeGregory@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>> Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2009-07-30, Tim Smith <reply_in_group@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> > In article <7ua9k6-nrb.ln1@xxxxxxxxxx>, Homer <usenet@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> http://jonreagan.wordpress.com/about/
>>> >>
>>> >> Another naive pragmatist.
>>> >>
>>> >> Is there some particular reason people shouldn't be allowed to
>>> >> criticise morally bankrupt companies like Microsoft, and their
>>> >> equally morally deficient supporters?
>>> >
>>> > Criticize? Yes. Repeatedly lie and make unbacked accusations? No.
>>>
>>> So, you agree that Quark should be sanctioned for lying about linux
>>> advocates?
>>
>> No one should repeatedly lie. Do you agree Schestowitz should stop
>> repeatedly lying and making unbacked accusations?
>
> Or should Ahlstrom stop lying about Moshe laughing about Peter's dad
> being seriously ill? That was the bottom of the barrel even for him.
>
Except that flatfish did so. He later tried some sort of apology for his
extremely bad manners.
But that does not change the fact that flatfish was in asshole mode first.
You should buy a introduction to reading comprehension for your very first
earned 2 cents, "true linux advocate" Hadron Snot Quark
--
Hanlon's Razor: Never attribute to malice which can be equally well
explained by stupidity
|
|
