-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
It's Not Open Science if it's Not Open Source
,----[ Quote ]
| Great to see a scientist come out with this in an interesting post
| entitled "What, exactly, is Open Science?":
|
| granting access to source code is really equivalent to publishing your
| methodology when the kind of science you do involves numerical
| experiments. I’m an extremist on this point, because without access to
| the source for the programs we use, we rely on faith in the coding
| abilities of other people to carry out our numerical experiments.
`----
http://opendotdotdot.blogspot.com/2009/07/its-not-open-science-if-its-not-open.html
Chris Anderson's Free adds much to The Long Tail, but falls short
,----[ Quote ]
| The economics of 'free' goods and services cannot be explained in terms of
| the marketplace, digital or otherwise – humans are more complicated than that
`----
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/2009/jul/28/cory-doctorow-free-chris-anderson
The Open-Minded Professor - An Interview with Eric von Hippel, MIT’s Sloan
School of Management
,----[ Quote ]
| It is true that the most rapidly developing designs are those where many can
| participate and where the intellectual property is open. Think about open
| source software as an example of this. What firms have to remember is that
| they have many ways to profit from good new products, independent of IP.
| They’ve got brands; they’ve got distribution; they’ve got lead time in the
| market. They have a lot of valuable proprietary assets that are not dependent
| on IP.
|
| If you’re going to give out your design capability to others, users
| specifically, then what you have to do is build your business model on the
| non-design components of your mix of competitive advantages. For instance,
| recall the case of custom semiconductor firms I mentioned earlier. Those
| companies gave away their job of designing the circuit to the user, but they
| still had the job of manufacturing those user-designed semiconductors, they
| still had the brand, they still had the distribution. And that’s how they
| make their money.
|
| It is also true that firms can base their new products on user-developed
| designs and still capture significant IP protection from internally developed
| improvements. That is the pattern we found in research we did at 3M. Even
| when 3M developers sourced the basic idea for a new product line from users,
| they were able to capture strong IP by patenting their improvements to the
| user idea.
`----
http://www.deloitte.com/view/en_US/us/Insights/Browse-by-Content-Type/deloitte-review/article/7930c99d77ea2210VgnVCM200000bb42f00aRCRD.htm
Publishing science on the web
,----[ Quote ]
| But the Web does a lot of this for us outside of science. It's become easy to
| write and read, and to use Google as a memory cache. The ability to rapidly
| find relevant information is part of daily life for us outside of science.
| But inside of science there is complaint that even within one's own
| specialized discipline, there is too much to read, too many journals, too
| little time. This doesn't even begin to include the coming deluge of data
| wrought by the relentless miniaturization and parallelization of a world
| where data is generated by robotic lab machinery and captured by tiny,
| ubiquitous sensors.
`----
http://scienceblogs.com/commonknowledge/2009/07/publishing_science_on_the_web.php
Recent:
Knowledge Exchange comparative report on Costs and Benefits of Open Access
,----[ Quote ]
| In June 2009 a study was completed that had been commissioned by Knowledge
| Exchange and written by Professor John Houghton, Victoria University,
| Australia. This report on the study was titled: "Open Access – What are the
| economic benefits?
`----
http://www.knowledge-exchange.info/Default.aspx?ID=316
Do We Need Open Access Journals?
,----[ Quote ]
| On the one hand, it would be ironic if the very field that acted as a midwife
| to open access journals should also be the one that begins to undermine it
| through a move to repository-based open publishing of preprints. On the
| other, it doesn't really matter; what's important is open access to the
| papers. If these are in preprint form, or appear as fully-fledged articles in
| peer-reviewed open access journals is a detail, for the users at least; it's
| more of a challenge for publishers, of course...
`----
http://opendotdotdot.blogspot.com/2009/07/do-we-need-open-access-journals.html
Sir Bonar on Intercept Modernisation at Open Tech 09
,----[ Quote ]
| Sir Bonar Neville-Kingdom GCMG KCVO is her Majesty’s most senior civil
| servant concerned with information and communications technologies
| (or ‘ICTs’). Here he speaks about about the benefits of how government uses
| ICTs to provide Intercept Modernisation, Personalised Services, and Safeguard
| your Identity.
`----
http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2009/07/sir-bonar-on-intercept-modernisation-at-open-tech-09/
The Doctor Who Model of Open Source
,----[ Quote ]
| How do we sustain Open Source in a distributed world? We are facing this
| challenge with several of our chemical software creations/packages. People
| move, institutions change. Open Source does not, of itself, grow and
| flourish – it needs nurturing. Many packages require a lot of work before
| they are in a state to be usefully enhanced by the community - “throw it over
| the wall and it will flourish” does not work.
|
| Many OS projects have clear governance and (at least implicitly) funded
| management. Examples are Apache, Eclipse, etc. Many others have the “BDFL” -
| Benevolent Dictator For Life with characters such as RBS, Linus, Guido
| Python, Larry Perl, etc. These command worldwide respect and they have income
| models which are similar to literary giants. These models don’t (yet?) work
| for chemistry.
`----
http://wwmm.ch.cam.ac.uk/blogs/murrayrust/?p=2059
UNESCO releases new publication on open educational resources
,----[ Quote ]
| UNESCO has released its first openly licensed publication. Open Educational
| Resources: Conversations in Cyberspace brings together the background papers
| and reports from the first three years of activities in the UNESCO OER
| Community. Access the online edition – or buy the book!
`----
http://portal.unesco.org/ci/en/ev.php-URL_ID=28899&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html
Why Scientific Publishing Will Never be the Same
,----[ Quote ]7
| For those of us tracking open access and its wider import, it's pretty clear
| that scientific publishing has changed for ever. But for some within the
| industry, there remains the desperate hope that all this new-fangled open,
| collaborative stuff will just blow over.
`----
http://opendotdotdot.blogspot.com/2009/06/why-scientific-publishing-will-never-be.html
It's Our Data: Time to Open Up
,----[ Quote ]
| Last week I wrote about David Cameron's fine words about cancelling ID cards
| and generally opening up data. It was full of sound and fury, but I reserve
| judgement on just how much it really signified.
|
| But here's a hopeful sign that things really might change if the Tories win
| power at the next general election. It's a new report from the Centre for
| Policy Studies
`----
http://www.computerworlduk.com/community/blogs/index.cfm?blogid=14&entryid=2312
Open Access and the A-Bomb
,----[ Quote ]
| Importantly, by putting their papers into arXiv physicists ensure that they
| are freely available to anyone who wishes to access them – assuming they have
| an Internet connection – regardless of whether they or their institution has
| a subscription to the journal in which the paper is published. Indeed, some
| papers in arXiv are never published in a journal at all.
`----
http://poynder.blogspot.com/2009/06/open-access-and-a-bomb.html
Book Publisher Eksmo Acquires Online Ebook Store LitRes
http://blog.quintura.com/2009/06/22/book-publisher-eksmo-acquires-online-ebook-store-litres/?owa_from=feed&owa_sid=
Article: It’s our data
,----[ Quote ]
| The 700,000 pages of scanned images put online in pdf were described by Sir
| Stuart Bell as a ‘great achievement’ for Parliament. And I suppose it is if
| you’re used to inscribing your words on animal skins.
`----
http://www.yrtk.org/2009/article-its-our-data/
Five minutes of your time to help us: take part in UK PubMed Central images
survey
,----[ Quote ]
| The British Library project team, which manages development activities for
| UKPMC, and is specifically tasked with identifying additional, hard to find
| content to add to UKPMC, is keen to understand what types of images
| researchers would find useful for potential inclusion in the repository.
`----
http://ukpmc.blogspot.com/2009/06/five-minutes-of-your-time-to-help-us.html
Finding a fair price for free knowledge
,----[ Quote ]
| TEN years ago, a piece of software called Napster taught us that scarcity is
| no longer a law of nature. The physics of our universe would allow everyone
| with access to a networked computer to enjoy, for free, every song, every
| film, every book, every piece of research, every computer program, every last
| thing that could be made out of digital ones and zeros. The question became
| not, will nature allow it, but will our legal and economic system ever allow
| it?
`----
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20227141.000-finding-a-fair-price-for-free-knowledge.html?DCMP=OTC-rss&nsref=tech
No Raw Data on Recovery.gov. Significant Failure
,----[ Quote ]
| Speaking for the coalition, Gary Bass, OMB Watch’s director and CAR’s
| co-chair, applauded the significant transparency steps OMB has taken in
| certain key respects. However, much data from the recipients of Recovery Act
| funds will not be collected or disclosed according the the new guidelines.
`----
http://blog.sunlightfoundation.com/2009/06/25/no-raw-data-on-recoverygov-significant-failure/
ScenicOrNot raw data now available for re-use
,----[ Quote ]
| It’s available under the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial 3
| Licence, and we greatly look forward to seeing what people do with it.
`----
http://www.mysociety.org/2009/06/26/scenicornot-raw-data-now-available-for-re-use/
Elsevier Does a Microsoft with Open Access
,----[ Quote ]
| I've seen these kind of stories so many times in the world of open source,
| with Microsoft as the main protagonist, that they warm the cockles of my
| heart when I see them popping up in other areas like open access. Why?
| Because if a multi-billion pound company like Elsevier is starting to stoop
| to this kind of tactic, it demonstrates just how profoundly worried it is -
| and how close open access is to widespread acceptance.
`----
http://opendotdotdot.blogspot.com/2009/06/elsevier-does-microsoft-with-open.html
Elsevier Reveals More Details About Its Fake Journal Division
,----[ Quote ]
| Remember how Elsevier and Merck were caught putting out a fake journal that
| had articles favoring Merck drugs, implying peer reviewed articles that
| weren't? Soon afterwards, it came out that Elsevier had a whole division for
| such things. However, following an internal investigation, it looks like
| Elsevier is backtracking a bit and saying that, while the group's practices
| were problematic, most weren't as egregious as the "Australasian Journal of
| Bone and Joint Medicine (AJBJM)" that was created by Merck and Elsevier.
`----
http://techdirt.com/articles/20090606/0632555149.shtml
Elsevier Had A Whole Division Publishing Fake Medical Journals
,----[ Quote ]
| Remember a week ago when we wrote about pharma giant Merck and publishing
| giant Elsevier working together to publish a fake journal that talked up
| various Merck drugs and was used by doctors to show that the drugs were safe
| and useful?
`----
http://techdirt.com/articles/20090510/2157144822.shtml
No bottom to worse at Elsevier?
,----[ Quote ]
| The latest development, though, strikes me as something that should be
| shouted from every available rooftop: Elsevier simply must answer the
| questions raised.
|
| Via Dorothea: Jonathan Rochkind has done a little "forensic librarianship"
| and raised astonishing questions about the entire imprint, Excerpta Medica,
| which published the fake journal that started all of this.
|
| Go read Jonathan, but the bottom line is this: Excerpta Medica does not
| provide a straightforward list of its own publications or make clear which
| are, ahem, "industry-sponsored".
`----
http://www.sennoma.net/main/archives/2009/05/no_bottom_to_worse_at_elsevier.php
Another Reason We Need Open Access
,----[ Quote ]
| One of the more laughable reasons that traditional science publishers cite in
| their attempts to rubbish open access is that it's somehow not so rigorous
| as "their" kind of publishing. There's usually a hint that standards might be
| dropped, and that open access journals aren't, well, you know, quite proper.
`----
http://opendotdotdot.blogspot.com/2009/05/another-reason-we-need-open-access.html
Merck Makes Phony Peer-Review Journal
,----[ Quote ]
| It is this attitude within companies like Merck and among doctors that allows
| scandals precisely like this to happen. While the scandals with Merck and
| Vioxx are particularly egregious, we know they are not isolated incidents.
| This one is just particularly so. If physicians would not lend their names or
| pens to these efforts, and publishers would not offer their presses, these
| publications could not exist. What doctors would have as available data would
| be peer-reviewed research and what pharmaceutical companies produce from
| their marketing departments--actual advertisements.
`----
http://blog.bioethics.net/2009/05/merck-makes-phony-peerreview-journal/
Merck And Elsevier Exposed For Creating Fake Peer Review Journal
,----[ Quote ]
| Of course, this is exactly the sort of thing that you can do when everything
| is locked up and proprietary, rather than open. There's almost no way to
| confirm or check the data or information to make sure it's legit, so people
| tend to assume it is. In that regard, perhaps it's no surprise that the two
| companies eventually went down this road, but it does highlight one of the
| problems with the way the system works today. As Shirky later points out this
| is hardly unique for a firm like Elsevier, which has faced some serious
| ethical questions regarding its publications in the past as well.
`----
http://techdirt.com/articles/20090503/1255574725.shtml
Related:
The serials crisis has a name, and it's Reed Elsevier.
,----[ Quote ]
| Mind you, I don't mean to imply that we should launch another boycott;
| reigning in Elsevier's profit margins and/or market share would do little to
| offset the serials crisis. The only answer to that, in the long term, is Open
| Access, because it scales where Toll access doesn't. No, this entry is not
| really about OA at all, it's just a little kick in the shins for my favorite
| Greedy Bastard Publishers.
`----
http://www.sennoma.net/main/archives/2008/12/the_serials_crisis_has_a_name.php
Elsevier steals, then copyrights other people's free stuff
,----[ Quote ]
| Reed Elsevier caught copying my content without my permission:
|
| I was not asked for, and did not give, permission for my work to appear
| on that page, much less in that format. Needless to say, I felt a little
| slighted.
|
| The website in question appears to be a custom version of the LexisNexis
| search engine. This particular version appears to be Elsevier's own
| custom version, intended for internal use. I don't have conclusive proof
| of that, but the title bar at the top of the page reads, "Elsevier
| Corporate", and the person who accessed my blog from that page had an IP
| address that's registered to MD Consult, which is an Elsevier subsidiary.
| My guess is that Elsevier's keeping track of news articles and blog posts
| that mention them, along with the context in which they're mentioned.
|
| [...]
|
| Reed Elsevier Is Stealing My Words:
|
| I received an email from ScienceBlogling Mike Dunford that Reed Elsevier
| had excerpted one of my posts. No problem there--I like it when people
| read my stuff....except for one thing:
|
| The fuckers copyrighted my words.
|
| Copyright violation?:
|
| Apparently, publishing companies don't always get permission for the
| materials they use, either. Mike Dunford caught Reed Elsevier copying his
| content without permission (from Stephen Downes).
`----
http://scienceblogs.com/clock/2008/08/elsevier_steals_then_copyright.php
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkpzLrAACgkQU4xAY3RXLo7oUwCgk8mRfLqspo97DB1jG5u6S7oA
d0MAnj7V73tSRBLWoKGeVu3D++ZXZGrJ
=6SaI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|
