Ezekiel wrote:
>
> "Peter K�hlmann" <peter-koehlmann@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:h4clhi$j1k$01$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Ezekiel wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> "Peter K?hlmann" <peter-koehlmann@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>> news:h4cihv$8gd$02$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> /quote
>>>> Apple claims that hundreds of thousands of iPhones are being used by
>>>> corporations and government agencies. What it won't tell you is that
>>>> the supposedly enterprise-friendly encryption included with the
>>>> iPhone 3GS is so weak it can be cracked in two minutes with a few
>>>> pieces of readily available freeware.
>>>> /unquote
>>>>
>>>> Another blunder of those incompetent guys. Apple and security migles
>>>> just as badly as MS
>>>
>>>
>>> You seem to have forgotten to include the part where physical access
>>> to the iPhone is needed.
>>>
>>> <quote>
>>> If a thief got his hands on an iPhone, a little bit of free software
>>> is all that's needed to tap into all of the user's content.
>>> </quote>
>>
>> What part of "incompetently made encryption" was too difficult for you?
>
> What part of you can't dereference a NULL pointer was too difficult for
> you?
Poor Scott Ezekiel Nudds. Can't even address the subject
--
Another name for a Windows tutorial is crash course
|
|
