On Sat, 18 Jul 2009 07:40:49 -0400, Ezekiel wrote:
> "Rick" <none@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:HdOdneJTG-CNKfzXnZ2dnUVZ_oxi4p2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> On Sat, 18 Jul 2009 06:42:28 -0400, Ezekiel wrote:
>>
>>> "Roy Schestowitz" <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>> news:1634379.ZzzyOrH0S9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>>
>>>> Intel claims No. 2 Linux contributor spot as hedge against Microsoft
>>>
>>>
>>> Novell contributes 6% of all the kernel changes. Google isn't even on
>>> the list.
>>>
>>> So why isn't Google being demonized?
>>
>> Why should they be demonized for not being on the list, and by whom?
>
> Demonized by the same freetards who like to demonize Novell. Because
> unlike Google... Novell actually *does* contribute to Linux.
Bigotry noted...
So Novell contribute kernel code and Google doesn't. What does that have
to do with criticisms of Novell?
--
Rick
|
|
