After takin' a swig o' grog, Tim Smith belched out
this bit o' wisdom:
> Good article on how to advocate Linux without coming across as a lunatic:
Old stuff, old hat.
>> <http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/How-to-Advocate-for-Linux-Without-Coming-Across-as-a-Lunatic-67546.html?wlc=1247193160&wlc=1247257272>
>
> Of course, Schestowitz already has an article up at BN complaining about
> how LinuxInsider is attacking the character of Linux by associating
> Linux with lunatics, and insinuating that Microsoft is behind
> LinuxInsider.
Link? It ain't on the front page.
A search there for "all:LinuxInsider" turns up empty:
http://boycottnovell.com/wiki/index.php?title=Special%3ASearch&search=all%3ALinuxInsider&ns0=1&fulltext=Search
No page text matches
Note: Only some namespaces are searched by default. Try prefixing your
query with all: to search all content (including talk pages, templates,
etc), or use the desired namespace as prefix.
> Roy claims it is just a stereotype that some advocates are
> lunatics.
Indeed, that would be correct. There are lunatics in all groups; "linux
advocates" is no exception.
Or should we take your claim about Roy's claim as a piece of sophistry?
> Ironically, in the *SAME* article, he complains about how Mark Fink (who
> Roy once offered to let edit part of BN) and others are too zealous and
> make BN look bad.
Are you shilling for BoycottNovell, Tim?
Otherwise, I wouldn't have bothered going to that site.
Roy, toss Timmy a doggie drop.
--
If your life was a horse, you'd have to shoot it.
|
|
