Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: [News] Mono Reported as a "Bug" in GNU/Linux

Roy Schestowitz wrote:
> ____/ Marti van Lin on Friday 19 June 2009 07:18 : \____
> 
> 
>> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
> 
>>> Patent Convenant considered discriminatory
>>>
>>> ,----[ Quote
>>> | The patent covenant is probably to be considered discriminatory in
>>> | reference to other programs.
>>> |
>>> | What follow apparently means that use of covered technologies, such as
>>> | Mono is to be considered unsafe (for covenant purposes) for developing
>>> | parts of the software cited below.
>>> |
>>> | read the patent covenant:
>>> |
>>>
> http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/758004/000095013407012375/f26782exv10w35.htm
>>> `----
>>>
>>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/mononono/+bug/387021
>> Mono is not a bug, it's a trojan.
> 
>>> Miguel: http://pastebin.com/f4c3dce66
>> Uch, the bumboy of Hadron Q00k.
> 
>>> Mono in Ubuntu, Yes or No?
>> NO! at least not by default.
> 
>> Ubuntu doesn't ship with proprietary stuff and binary blobs by default,
>> because of (possible) license issues. Thus to ship MONO by default is
>> odd and hypocrite.
> 
>> NOMO!
> 
> Notice how much time the trolls in COLA are spending on the promotion of Mono.
> It's very telling, isn't it? They are anti-Linux, just like Mono.

Indeed it is revealing, but wait there is more.

The Ubuntu forums are infiltrated with Microsoft/Mono shills for about a
year now.

At least the English and the Dutch forums are.

Some of the responses to NeighborLee, where quite telling, weren't they?

At least one of the MS/Mono shills is already a forum moderator.

Beware of wolves in sheep clothes...

-- 
|_|0|_| Marti van Lin
|_|_|0| http://ml2mst.googlepages.com
|0|0|0| http://osgeex.blogspot.com


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index