Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: [News] Mono Reported as a "Bug" in GNU/Linux

On 2009-06-21, Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> claimed:
>
> ____/ Marti van Lin on Friday 19 June 2009 07:18 : \____
>
>> 
>> 
>> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>> 
>>> Patent Convenant considered discriminatory
>>> 
>>> ,----[ Quote
>>> | The patent covenant is probably to be considered discriminatory in
>>> | reference to other programs.
>>> |
>>> | What follow apparently means that use of covered technologies, such as
>>> | Mono is to be considered unsafe (for covenant purposes) for developing
>>> | parts of the software cited below.
>>> |
>>> | read the patent covenant:
>>> |
>>>
> http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/758004/000095013407012375/f26782exv10w35.htm
>>> `----
>>> 
>>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/mononono/+bug/387021
>> 
>> Mono is not a bug, it's a trojan.
>> 
>>> Miguel: http://pastebin.com/f4c3dce66
>> 
>> Uch, the bumboy of Hadron Q00k.
>> 
>>> Mono in Ubuntu, Yes or No?
>> 
>> NO! at least not by default.
>> 
>> Ubuntu doesn't ship with proprietary stuff and binary blobs by default,
>> because of (possible) license issues. Thus to ship MONO by default is
>> odd and hypocrite.
>> 
>> NOMO!
>
> Notice how much time the trolls in COLA are spending on the promotion of Mono.
> It's very telling, isn't it? They are anti-Linux, just like Mono.

What I notice is how much time they're spending on avoiding the issue
of licensing. Every time Marti mentions it, they provide a tap-dance,
then blame him for not having the answer he's not getting from them.

-- 
Useless Invention: Leather cutlery.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Eee PC900 16G SSD 2G RAM Ubuntu 9.04

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index