Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] Smart People Start Standing Up Against Intellectual Monopolies

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

A unique person with a unique common sense in the EP

,----[ Quote ]
| It’s not just about the profits of the pharmaceutical industry. The proposed 
| alternative to pharmaceutical patents starts from the fact that the big 
| pharmaceutical companies officially admit they only spend 15% of their 
| revenues on research, to suggest that the governments could take 20% of what 
| they currently spend on drugs (which is a lot of money!) and allocate it to 
| pharmaceutical research, with the results free to anyone. However, the Pirate 
| Party is the only political party to have asserted that all kind of patents 
| have to be abolished, not only the pharmaceutical patents and the software 
| patents!        
`----

http://beranger.org/v3/wordpress/2009/06/10/a-unique-person-with-common-sense-in-the-ep/


Recent:

What use are research patents?

,----[ Quote ]
| In any case, I'm not buying David's assertion that "most universities", or
| most hospitals or research institutes for that matter, rely heavily on
| licensing income. And that being so, I am also somewhat skeptical about the
| number of researchers' families being supported by patents.
|
| What's the Open Science connection? Well, if you're interested in patenting
| the results of your research, there are a lot of restrictions on how you can
| disseminate your results. You can't keep an Open Notebook, or upload
| unprotected work to a preprint server or publicly-searchable repository, or
| even in many cases talk about the IP-related parts of your work at
| conferences. It seems from the data above that most universities would not be
| losing much if they gave up chasing patents entirely; nor would they be
| risking much future income, since so few seem to get significant funds from
| licensing.
`----

http://www.sennoma.net/main/archives/2009/06/what_use_are_research_patents.php


Time to rethink intellectual property laws?

,----[ Quote ]
| Conversely, there is widespread anecdotal evidence that the act created a
| mind-set among many researchers that their knowledge represents a potential
| goldmine not to be shared with potential competitors (i.e. those working in
| other universities) - at least until it has been protected by a patent
| application.
|
| Similarly, the act has led to a flood of “upstream” patents on basic
| scientific knowledge, leading to what some commentators describe as a
| virtually impenetrable “patent thicket” blocking small-scale inventors from
| marketing their products. For example, restrictive software patents limit
| further development and commercialisation in the field of information
| technology.
`----

http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=8543&page=
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAko1lnUACgkQU4xAY3RXLo6aeQCfUrtj89CGtSZmK6fzl5ozltfG
W3oAnjN3Va1tJVVIa9v2Grig0pOA2+GS
=/TbM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index