-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
BSA urges London companies to check for pirate software
,----[ Quote ]
| The BSA said that it is already investigating several companies in the London
| area for using unlicensed software. “As a result, these businesses face the
| prospect of legal proceedings and the BSA is urging other businesses to avoid
| being subject to the same fate,” it said in a statement. “In the current
| economic climate, London’s businesses cannot afford to waste money on legal
| actions, subsequent financial settlements and the unplanned purchase of
| legitimate software.”
`----
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/06/02/bsa_audit/
Free software users laugh all the way to the audit.
Recent:
BSA's Canadian Piracy Numbers Based On Hunches, Not Actual Surveys
,----[ Quote ]
| The Conference Board of Canada that was basically a cut and paste from
| various industry groups, Geist noticed that the report relied on some BSA
| data. So he asked for more info on how the BSA determined the "piracy" rate
| of software in Canada. How many people were surveyed? What was the
| methodology?
`----
http://techdirt.com/articles/20090527/1125035034.shtml
BSA Releases BS Numbers Yet Again, Then Says Don't Pay Attention To The
Numbers
,----[ Quote ]
| Well, it's the middle of May, and that means (like clockwork) the Business
| Software Alliance (BSA) and IDC have come out with their annual bogus numbers
| about software "piracy." They do this every year, despite the fact that their
| numbers have been totally and completely debunked for years. Last year, they
| were kind enough to call to discuss my concerns, but stood by the idea that
| every unauthorized copy can be reasonably counted as a lost sale.
`----
http://techdirt.com/articles/20090512/1922584854.shtml
Aargh! Walk the plank ye scurvy dogs!
,----[ Quote ]
| According to Channel Insider the Business Software Alliance and IDC report
| that software piracy in 2008 cost over $50 billion in lost direct sales and
| $150 to $200 billion in lost service and support.
|
| No analysis is offered as to whether the alleged pirates could have paid for
| licensed copies of the software in question had they chosen to. Nor is it
| explained why users of properly licensed software would have required $150 to
| $200 billion in additional service and support while the pirates manage to do
| without. Rugged, self-sufficient folks those pirates, I suppose.
`----
http://bringcookies.wordpress.com/2009/05/13/aargh-walk-the-plank-ye-scurvy-dogs/
The true cost of software piracy revealed
,----[ Quote ]
| OK, let's forget the spin put on the piracy problem by the usual industry
| suspects. By which I mean the suggestion that the true cost of piracy is that
| it helps fund terrorists.
|
| That is just silly nonsense, FUD designed to confuse rather than clarify what
| has become a growing problem.
`----
http://www.itwire.com/content/view/24982/1054/
Related:
Anti-piracy day? No thanks
,----[ Quote ]
| Today is Microsoft’s self-declared Global Anti-Piracy Day. No surprise then
| that the local arm of the Business Software Alliance has been ringing up
| journalists over the past couple of days with the ominous news that South
| Africa is losing between R2.8 billion to software pirates every year.
|
| As usual, the BSA statements are sweeping and presumptive.
|
| For a start, South Africa doesn’t really lose all this money. Most of the
| licensing money heads straight overseas to companies like Microsoft and Adobe
| with this country holding on to very little of it.
`----
http://www.tectonic.co.za/?p=3405
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkolhIcACgkQU4xAY3RXLo5QwQCgmMUqO73uRm29Wevv5e7bjAQ4
ckwAn28JBWZ7n+OXv8M9phafBcqY7wZi
=vs0b
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|
