Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] [Rival] Yet Another Vista (In)Capable Lawsuit is Born

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Acer sued for shipping Vista-book with GB of memory

,----[ Quote ]
| Two Middle Americans have sued Acer over its low-cost Aspire notebooks, 
| claiming that the Taiwanese PC giant pre-installed Windows Vista on machines 
| ill-equipped to run Microsoft's latest OS.  
| 
| With a lawsuit filed Wednesday in San Francisco, California, two residents of 
| Fostoria, Ohio seek damages and relief from the world's third-largest 
| computer maker after purchasing a sub-$600 Aspire notebook that included 
| Windows Vista Premium and a gigabyte of shared system and graphics memory.   
`----

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/03/27/acer_vista_suit/


Related:

Tech Titans, Big Retail Served In Microsoft Suit

,----[ Quote ]
| Top hardware and PC makers, several leading computer retailers and one key 
| Microsoft executive have been subpoenaed in the Vista Capable class-action 
| suit taking place in U.S. District Court in Seattle.  
`----

http://www.crn.com/it-channel/207000282


Vista Capable plaintiffs subpoena PC titans

,----[ Quote ]
| Other notable names on the list include Intel and former Windows chief Jim 
| Allchin. 
`----

http://blog.seattlepi.nwsource.com/microsoft/archives/135018.asp


Microsoft tries to stop more ‘Vista-capable’ e-mails from going public

,----[ Quote ]
| Microsoft is trying to put the kibosh on more of its internal (and 
| embarassing) e-mail messages around its Vista marketing plans going public. 
| 
| [...]
| 
| With every version of Windows, Microsoft has worked with hardware partners to 
| find new ways to try to convince users they need more and more powerful 
| machines to take advantage of more feature-rich software. If Microsoft and 
| its partners were/are successful, it means more money in the PC makers’ and 
| Microsoft’s coffers. With Vista, this pact really back-fired, as the already 
| published e-mails around Vista-capable — and more, as-yet-unpublicized 
| messages — will make evident.      
`----

http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=1254


Microsoft challenges 'Vista Capable' class action

,----[ Quote ]
| If granted, the motion would also postpone any new disclosures of potentially 
| embarrassing company e-mails. 
`----

http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9067400


They Criticized Vista. And They Should Know.

,----[ Quote ]
| Act 1: In 2005, Microsoft plans to say that only PCs that are properly 
| equipped to handle the heavy graphics demands of Vista are “Vista Ready.” 
| 
| Act 2: In early 2006, Microsoft decides to drop the graphics-related hardware 
| requirement in order to avoid hurting Windows XP sales on low-end machines 
| while Vista is readied. (A customer could reasonably conclude that Microsoft 
| is saying, Buy Now, Upgrade Later.) A semantic adjustment is made: Instead of 
| saying that a PC is “Vista Ready,” which might convey the idea that, well, it 
| is ready to run Vista, a PC will be described as “Vista Capable,” which 
| supposedly signals that no promises are made about which version of Vista 
| will actually work.       
| 
| The decision to drop the original hardware requirements is accompanied by 
| considerable internal protest. The minimum hardware configuration was set so 
| low that “even a piece of junk will qualify,” Anantha Kancherla, a Microsoft 
| program manager, said in an internal e-mail message among those recently 
| unsealed, adding, “It will be a complete tragedy if we allowed it.”    
| 
| Act 3: In 2007, Vista is released in multiple versions, including “Home 
| Basic,” which lacks Vista’s distinctive graphics. This placed Microsoft’s 
| partners in an embarrassing position. Dell, which gave Microsoft a postmortem 
| report that was also included among court documents, dryly 
| remarked: “Customers did not understand what ‘Capable’ meant and expected 
| more than could/would be delivered.”     
`----

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/09/business/09digi.html?_r=2&pagewanted=2&oref=slogin


Microsoft knew of Vista shortcoming prior to release

http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/microsoft-knew-vista-shortcoming-prior/story.aspx?guid=%7B75BE59C7%2DEFA1%2D48B5%2DB4A4%2D90F5E01A52A0%7D&siteid=yhoof


Microsoft dropped Vista hardware spec to raise Intel profits

http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2008/03/01/microsoft_intel_vista_capable_emails/


Microsoft 'Caves' To Intel 

http://www.forbes.com/2008/02/28/microsoft-vista-intel-tech-ebiz-cx_wt_0228vista.html?partner=yahootix


Has Vista lost all credibility?

http://apcmag.com/8344/has_vista_lost_all_credibility


E-mail: Microsoft 'botched' dealings with Intel, HP

,----[ Quote ]
| Internal Microsoft e-mails revealed through a federal class-action lawsuit 
| arising from the troubled launch last year of the Windows Vista operating 
| system have provided a provocative inside look at the software giant's 
| machinations with Intel, HP and Dell.   
| 
| The e-mails include an exchange in which one senior Microsoft executive 
| described dealings with computer makers as "really botched." Another manager 
| complained Microsoft was "caving to Intel" and "really burning HP."  
| 
| The e-mails are included in 145 pages of documents unsealed by U.S. District 
| Judge Marsha Pechman in Seattle late Wednesday. They include internal 
| reports and some handwritten notes that offer a rare look inside at the 
| famed "Wintel" partnership, and touch upon the alliance's dealings with 
| Hewlett-Packard, Dell and other computer makers.    
`----

http://origin.mercurynews.com/businessheadlines/ci_8417811?nclick_check=1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAknNdWcACgkQU4xAY3RXLo5h0gCeIYE+xhX2IrfMU/hSUM1fGPtB
kzYAoIgHYoJRAVuRJtMCxRqEetiiYkDs
=39Qp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index