-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
____/ RonB on Saturday 21 March 2009 19:05 : \____
> On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 04:38:19 -0500, Roy Schestowitz
> <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>> ____/ Doug Mentohl on Tuesday 17 March 2009 18:49 : \____
>>> 'the purpose of this portfolio is defensive .. because of the threats of
>>> companies that are hostile to FOSS and that have amassed large
>>> stockpiles of overbroad patents'
>>> 'Although there have been some recent questions about one of our patent
>>> applications relating to the AMQP specification, they appear to
>>> originate in an attempt to spread FUD. There’s no reasonable, objective
>>> basis for controversy'
>> It's not really FUD.
>> The former head of the FFII is sure to publicise information which
>> suggests that Red Hat is not or was not serious about ending software
>> patents. People should not let them off the hook so easily.
> So... are you against any commercial sales of Linux?
No, see the following for details:
I too defended Red Hat on this until I discovered the other side of the story.
> Red Hat has stated
> (over and over) that their patents are for defensive purposes. The company
> depends on open source development to survive. Do you think that, at some
> point, they'll say "Okay, we can take it from here, no more open
> development... it's all ours now" Have they done ANYTHING to indicate that
> this is the direction they will be going in the future?
> Some people seem to be willing to cut off their noses to spite their face.
> I just don't get it.
~~ Best of wishes
Roy S. Schestowitz | Download Othello: http://othellomaster.com
http://Schestowitz.com | GNU/Linux | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Mem: 2075800k total, 1660792k used, 415008k free, 12460k buffers
http://iuron.com - next generation of search paradigms
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----