-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
____/ ml2mst on Saturday 21 March 2009 10:34 : \____
> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>> ____/ Doug Mentohl on Tuesday 17 March 2009 18:49 : \____
>>> 'the purpose of this portfolio is defensive .. because of the threats of
>>> companies that are hostile to FOSS and that have amassed large
>>> stockpiles of overbroad patents'
>>> 'Although there have been some recent questions about one of our patent
>>> applications relating to the AMQP specification, they appear to
>>> originate in an attempt to spread FUD. Theres no reasonable, objective
>>> basis for controversy'
>> It's not really FUD.
>> The former head of the FFII is sure to publicise information which suggests
>> that Red Hat is not or was not serious about ending software patents. People
>> should not let them off the hook so easily.
> I enjoyed Pieter's comments on BN, but I am pretty confused here. What
> does it mean, is Redhat becoming another patent troll or am I
> misinterpreting this?
No, but it just doesn't do enough to combat swpats. In some ways, it adds to
> What I recently learned from BN and especially Pieter Hintjens is that
> we (Europeans) are in trouble. The software patent lobby (of course led
> by the Evil empire of MICROS~666) is marching on and nobody pays
> attention and that the FFII has become corrupt (pretty much like ISO).
> Please correct me if I'm wrong.
Corrupt? No, it's just a lot less active.
> I have signed a petition against the legalization of software patents in
> Europe several times, but it is not working to well, is it?
Nokia/Symbian caused damage.
> So what I am asking of you, my fellow Europeans is to stay allert and
> fight software patents as much as we can.
> It is a fact that we, Europeans copy most of Americans behavior,
> unfortunately we are starting to copy their stupidity as well more and
> more. Please don't let it happen.
> NO SOFTWARE PATENTS IN EUROPE!
> SweatyB (the übermaroon) can scream all he wants.
> Have a nice weekend ;-)
> Cheers, Mart
~~ Best of wishes
"Monopoly raises two classes of problems for a free society. First, the
existence of monopoly means a limitation on voluntary exchange through a
reduction in the alternatives available to individuals. Second, the existence
of monopoly raises the issue of “social responsibility”, as it has come to be
called, of the monopolist."
http://Schestowitz.com | Free as in Free Beer | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Load average (/proc/loadavg): 2.22 1.66 1.31 5/278 8314
http://iuron.com - semantic search engine project initiative
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----