-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
____/ Gregory Shearman on Saturday 14 March 2009 04:02 : \____
> On 2009-03-13, Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> ____/ Kelsey Bjarnason on Friday 13 March 2009 18:42 : \____
>>
>>> On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 01:53:16 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>
>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>>
>>>> I didn't wrote this and it's made up.
>>>
>>> Ya think? :)
>>
>> Yes, but for future reference (the Munchkins love linking to their
>> old 'plants').
>>
>
> But... you always use sign your posts. They can't get around that one.
Yes, but they point to all sorts of archives where people can't check the
signatures.
First they try to refute posts
It's too hard for them
Then they try to find embarrassing things about the poster
They can't do this, either
So they need to start 'manufacturing' stuff
Fortunately, the 'plants' from the Munckins contain ludicrous stuff like
arrests and child molestation, so no sane person believes the libel to begin
with. It becomes comical.
- --
~~ Best of wishes
http://Schestowitz.com | GNU/Linux | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Swap: 4088500k total, 417880k used, 3670620k free, 264040k cached
http://iuron.com - next generation of search paradigms
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkm7L/EACgkQU4xAY3RXLo5uDQCgpjJZcPgE5XIzQTZKQHG2PN09
++IAn1U8ecjJ5zncCxmFGKZA3JmfxQD2
=vUlw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|
