Roy Schestowitz wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> ____/ JEDIDIAH on Saturday 14 March 2009 00:42 : \____
>
>> On 2009-03-13, Terry Porter <linux-2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Erik Funkenbusch wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 09:44:55 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>> [deletia]
>>>>>
http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/start_up_performance_something_that
>>>>
>>>> Wait... wait.. wait..
>>>>
>>>> But I thought OpenOffice.org was already blazingly fast?
>>>>
>>>> According to Sun's own benchmarks, it takes 24.8 seconds to start up.
>>>>
>>>> almost half a minute.
>>>>
>>>> So Terry, what was that bout OOo being so fast again?
>>>
>>>
>>> Erik, you're such an ignorant jerk. If you had ever tried OO on a LINUX
>>> SSD notebook, you wouldn't be proving it yet again here, for all to see.
>>>
>>> As I said, approx *** THREE SECONDS *** on my Linux netbooks, COLD.
>>
>> ...on my desktop box (the one I'm typing on now), it's 7 seconds.
>>
>> [deletia]
>
> 8 seconds (cold) on mine, with loads of services already open (so probably
> can be reduced to around 5 seconds).
>
> Second run 3 seconds with lots running in the BG. Can be 2 seconds, I'm
> sure...
My GNU/Gentoo/Linux workstation.
Booting OO was 7 - 8 seconds.
Booting OO from cache:-
tp@gronk1 ~ $ time oowriter
real 0m1.352s
user 0m0.013s
sys 0m0.034s
On this system:-
Linux gronk1 2.6.27-gentoo-r8 #1 SMP PREEMPT Thu Feb 12 12:19:44 EST 2009
i686 Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
top - 12:27:05 up 2 days, 2:07, 17 users, load average: 1.06, 1.09, 1.02
Tasks: 213 total, 1 running, 212 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu0 : 65.5%us, 1.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 31.9%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 1.6%si,
0.0%st
Cpu1 : 5.3%us, 1.3%sy, 0.0%ni, 93.3%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si,
0.0%st
Cpu2 : 0.7%us, 0.3%sy, 0.0%ni, 99.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si,
0.0%st
Cpu3 : 14.5%us, 1.3%sy, 0.0%ni, 84.2%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si,
0.0%st
Mem: 8244860k total, 3249156k used, 4995704k free, 659460k buffers
Swap: 19535032k total, 0k used, 19535032k free, 1375136k cached
--
If we wish to reduce our ignorance, there are people we will
indeed listen to. Trolls are not among those people, as trolls, more or
less by definition, *promote* ignorance.
Kelsey Bjarnason, C.O.L.A. 2008
|
|
