Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] Intellectual Monopolies Attacked by Economists

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Yet Another Study Shows How Patents Create Suboptimal Innovation

,----[ Quote ]
| [O]nce again, the study found that a free market solution greatly outperforms 
| a patent monopoly solution where the "first" provider gets a monopoly. The 
| research was led by economist Peter Bossaerts and a team of others -- and it 
| made a point that won't surprise anyone who's studied the economics of 
| monopolies. Patents tend to function just like any other monopoly system: it 
| shrinks the overall market, decreases net social benefit, provides 
| monstrously excess rewards to a single provider and harms everyone else. In 
| fact, the research found that the patent system created a massive 
| disincentive for many people to participate in the very process, even if 
| their contributions could have been quite helpful in speeding along the 
| innovation.          
`----

http://techdirt.com/articles/20090306/0159294018.shtml

Markets outperform patents in promoting intellectual discovery, say economists

,----[ Quote ]
| When it comes to intellectual curiosity and creativity, a market economy in 
| which inventors can buy and sell shares of the key components of their 
| discoveries actually beats out the winner-takes-all world of patent rights as 
| a motivating force, according to a California Institute of Technology 
| (Caltech)-led team of researchers.     
`----

http://www.physorg.com/news155486207.html


Related:

WIPO patent committee embarks on positive agenda

,----[ Quote ]
| The fact that the WIPO patent committee has decided to request the
| International Bureau studies on “exceptions from patentable subject matter
| and limitations to the rights, inter alia research exemption and compulsory
| licenses” and “patents and standards” is testament that the WIPO of 2008 is
| not the WIPO that invoked “Intellectual Property as a Power tool for
| Development”.
|
| Here below is the Annex to the Summary by the Chair which lists the eighteen
| non-exhaustive list of issues for further elaboration and discussion in the
| future. This list includes such topics as “Economic impact of the patent
| system, Alternative models for innovation, Patents and health (including
| exhaustion, the Doha Declaration and other WTO instruments, patent
| landscaping) and Relation of patents with other public policy issues.”
`----

http://www.keionline.org/index.php?option=com_jd-wp&Itemid=39&p=124


Open Parliament

,----[ Quote ]
| In private a government delegate compared
| Microsoft's public affairs methods with the scientology cult.
`----

http://www.noooxml.org/forum/t-54634/open-parliament


Intellectual Property Regime Stifles Science and Innovation, Nobel Laureates
Say

,----[ Quote ]
| Patent monopolies are believed to drive innovation but they actually impede
| the pace of science and innovation, Stiglitz said. The current “patent
| thicket,” in which anyone who writes a successful software programme is sued
| for alleged patent infringement, highlights the current IP system’s failure
| to encourage innovation, he said.
|
| Another problem is that the social returns from innovation do not accord with
| the private returns associated with the patent system, Stiglitz said. The
| marginal benefit from innovation is that an idea may become available sooner
| than it might have. But the person who secures the patent on it wins a
| long-term monopoly, creating a gap between private and social returns.
`----

http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=1129
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkmx3VwACgkQU4xAY3RXLo7bbwCggiMVJf7F161oKTXvjxGEvjYZ
gzoAoKrdRtxB0XX494QBqxMB9wtc/2IN
=jv1K
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index