On 2009-05-01, amicus_curious <ACDC@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> "JEDIDIAH" <jedi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:slrngvmi5r.okb.jedi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> On 2009-05-01, amicus_curious <ACDC@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> "Jerry McBride" <jmcbride@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>> news:i4qpc6xdqp.ln2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Windows 7 will never run on the ARM. Microsoft simply does not have the
>>>> money, time or talent.
>>>>
>>> Why would it ever have to do so? Windows Mobile has been running on the
>>> ARM
>>> processors and numerous others for years along with an appropriately
>>> sized
>>> version of MS Office. People can access Exchange and the internet on
>>> their
>>> cell phones now. What makes you think that anyone would want a netbook
>>> to
>>> do the same thing except not be able to make a phone call?
>>
>> All of your whining to the contrary.
>>
>> The sky is blue until it suits you to say that it is pink.
>>
>> Tomorrow you will be claiming that the sky is blue again.
>>
> If you have nothing to say, you would be better off saying nothing than
> showing your lack of substantive answers. You could at least pretend to be
> wise. The way you are doing it, though, lets everyone know how shallow you
> are.
The fact that you guys waffle on motivations and requirements depending
on which way the wind is blowing is VERY SUBSTANTIVE.
--
On the subject of kilobyte being "redefined" to mean 1000 bytes...
When I was a wee lad, I was taught that SI units were |||
meant to be computationally convenient rather than just / | \
arbitrarily assigned.
|
|
