Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: [News] Microsoft's Bribed-for Vista 7 'Coverage', as Explained by John C. Dvorak


Above the shrieking & FUDding of the trolls,Gregory Shearman was heard
to say:

> On 2009-08-11, Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> After takin' a swig o' grog, Homer belched out
>>   this bit o' wisdom:
>>
>>> Verily I say unto thee, that Chris Ahlstrom spake thusly:
>>>
>>>>    If anything will drive people to Linux, it will be this Registry
>>>>    centric architecture of Windows. Linux does not use this concept,
>>>>    although some maniacs are promoting the idea for some unknown 
>>>>    reason.
>>>> 
>>>> Who?  The Mono guys?  (I'm just wondering, not claiming anything.)
>>>
>>> He's talking about another of Gnome's Windows-esque concepts, the GConf
>>> Registry, whose schemas are not entirely unlike its Windows namesake.
>>>
>>> http://www.linuxinsight.com/how-to-cleanup-your-gnome-registry.html
>>
>>    Meet GConf Cleaner
>>
>>    The tool is still in early stages of development (version 0.0.2), but
>>    I've successfully run it on my desktop and was amazed how many old
>>    entries it found. Typically, if you install some GNOME application, play
>>    with it a little bit and later decide to delete it, it's configuration
>>    settings will remain in the GConf database. So your registry will only
>>    grow in time.
>>
>> Ye bloody gods!
>
> Erk! Microsoft for Linux.

Yeeeuuk!

-- 
Bugs come in through open Windows.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index