-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
____/ William Poaster on Wednesday 09 Sep 2009 13:37 : \____
> On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 13:34:41 +0200, above the shrieking & FUDding of the
> trolls, Peter KÃhlmann was heard to say:
>
>> Ezekiel wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> "Roy Schestowitz" <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>> news:16719657.W3vaeNJFYE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>>
>>>> ...turns out it just had a little hibernation, so it 'froze' for a few
>>>> seconds.
>>>>
>>>> roy@baine:~$ uptime
>>>> 19:53:21 up 224 days, 8:54, 2 users, load average: 0.02, 0.03, 0.00
>>>
>>> Hell with those kernel updates and security patches. It's more important
>>> to impress chrisv and Dumb Willy with your *uptime* number.
>>
>> If the service in question is not installed because it is not needed, why
>> update the kernel?
>> I always take a look at the reasons a patched kernel is provided (which
is
>> not *that* often). And more often than not I bypass the upgrade because
it
>> patches a bug in parts I don't use
>
> What *is* the idiotic "Dumb Zeke" troll on about? Uptime numbers for Linux
> don't impress me, as the one's I've seen posted are quite normal.
So, if uptime is low, that's bad. It it's high, that's bad too. Suits the
trolls, eh?
- --
~~ Best of wishes
In an Open world without walls or fences, who needs Windows or Gates? -- ??
http://Schestowitz.com | GNU is Not UNIX | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
roy pts/0 :0 Wed Sep 9 21:22 still logged in
http://iuron.com - proposing a non-profit search engine
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkqoTaUACgkQU4xAY3RXLo6uEwCfb/Z9zRm0YYz6AlIIyuQ2d3yq
pTMAn0hjuOKe3pGCIvSjjHfJEup2FAmk
=0I12
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|
