-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Lord Kames Explains Why Copyright Is Not Property... In 1773
,----[ Quote ]
| I've posted the full text of Lord Kames's opinion in the important
| Scottish Sessions case of Hinton v. Donaldson from 1773. This was the
| case that rejected for Scotland, by a vote of 11-to-1, the theory of
| "common law copyright", that authors (meaning, in practice, publishers)
| had a perpetual copyright, at common law, of their writings. It was
| followed a few months later by the English House of Lords's decision in
| Donaldson v. Beckett, in which the English Lords rejected just as
| forcefully the claim that authors had perpetual copyright under the
| common law of England.
`----
http://techdirt.com/articles/20090901/0318106070.shtml
The Real Problem With The Google Book Settlement Isn't The Settlement, But
Copyright Law Itself
,----[ Quote ]
| In Congressional hearings on Thursday about the Google book settlement,
| most of the news reports focused on two particular things: (1) the fact
| that Marybeth Peters, head of the US Copyright Office, spoke out against
| the settlement, claiming that it violates copyright law and (2) Google's
| "concession" in letting other booksellers offer up the "orphan works"
| that Google would scan. [...] The whole problem of "orphan works" is
| solely a result of the continual and ridiculous level of copyright
| expansion over the years that has created these so-called "orphan
| works." It seems that the only person who actually seemed willing to
| discuss that was Rep. Zoe Lofgren, who actually used the occasion to
| call for a repeal to the 1998 Copyright Term Extension Act, noting that
| it was a large part of the problem.
`----
http://techdirt.com/articles/20090910/1902136159.shtml
580,388 Orphan Works â Give or Take
,----[ Quote ]
| Clearly one of the most (if not the most) contentious issue regarding
| the Google Book Settlement (GBS) centers on the nebulous community of
| âorphans and orphan titlesâ. And yet, through the entirety of the
| discussion since the Google Book Settlement agreement was announced, no
| one has attempted to define how many orphans there really are. Allow me:
| 580,388. How do I know? Well, I admit, I do my share of guess work to
| get to this estimate, but I believe my analysis is based on key facts
| from which I have extrapolated a conclusion. Interestingly, I completed
| this analysis starting from two very different points and the first
| results were separated by only 3,000 works (before I made some minor
| adjustments).
`----
http://personanondata.blogspot.com/2009/09/580388-orphan-works-give-or-
take.html
Recent:
Lies, Damned Lies and Media Industry Numbers
,----[ Quote ]
| By quoting that number, they are effectively saying a vast swathe of
| the UK population is engaged in that activity. And as history teaches
| us, when such a vast proportion of a nation is doing something that is
| technically breaking the law, this shows not that these people are bad,
| but that such a law is self-evidently unjust to that nation.
`----
http://opendotdotdot.blogspot.com/2009/09/lies-damned-lies-and-media-
industry.html
How The UK Gov't Extrapolated 136 Self-Reported File Sharers Into 7
Million
http://techdirt.com/articles/20090904/1819236116.shtml
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkqq0+MACgkQU4xAY3RXLo6STACgluxZBJ23Uqwwf5bk399s64O1
U38An3yNAvoiwEMxdAalSzDs+0B+0fz5
=hIiS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|
