Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] Proprietary Device Can Turn Against Their Owners

  • Subject: [News] Proprietary Device Can Turn Against Their Owners
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2009 17:44:08 +0100
  • Followup-to: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • User-agent: KNode/4.3.1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Regulatorsâ Role Seen Rising As E-Content Tied To Devices 

,----[ Quote ]
| Amazon deleted the Kindle file of Orwell books to remove the 
| content, Manara said. The issue of sellersâ control over 
| devices arose in a French case in which a mobile phone 
| operatorâs customer discovered he could not use the phone with 
| another telecommunications provider because of lack of 
| interoperability. The user sued under an 1804 civil law 
| provision stating that âOwnership is the right to enjoy and 
| dispose of things in the most absolute manner.â A Paris court 
| ruled that the operator could not breach this fundamental 
| right, and that goods must be able to be used in the way their 
| owners expect.
`----

http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/2009/09/29/regulators-role-seen-rising-as-e-content-tied-to-devices/

Will the European Parliament take its last chance to save citizens' rights?

,----[ Quote ]
| "In our societies, access to the Internet is so instrumental 
| to people's ability to communicate with each other that 
| restricting or limiting this access cannot be decided by a 
| company or even an executive agency. Only a fair trial by the 
| judicial authority guarantees that citizens' rights will be 
| respected. It is now Catherine Trautmann's duty to ensure that 
| amendment 138 will protect citizens against the arbitrary 
| blocking or limiting of their Internet access." concludes 
| JÃrÃmie Zimmermann, spokesperson for the citizen advocacy 
| group La Quadrature du Net.
`----

http://www.laquadrature.net/en/will-the-european-parliament-take-its-last-chance-to-save-citizens-rights


Recent:

I've Seen the Future, and It Has a Kill Switch

,----[ Quote ]
| It used to be that just the entertainment industries wanted to control your
| computers -- and televisions and iPods and everything else -- to ensure that
| you didn't violate any copyright rules. But now everyone else wants to get
| their hooks into your gear.
|
| [...]
|
| And that's the key to understanding this system. Don't be fooled by the scare
| stories of wireless devices on airplanes and in hospitals, or visions of a
| world where no one is yammering loudly on their cellphones in posh
| restaurants. This is really about media companies wanting to exert their
| control further over your electronics. They not only want to prevent you from
| surreptitiously recording movies and concerts, they want your new television
| to enforce good "manners" on your computer, and not allow it to record any
| programs. They want your iPod to politely refuse to copy music to a computer
| other than your own. They want to enforce their legislated definition of
| manners: to control what you do and when you do it, and to charge you
| repeatedly for the privilege whenever possible.
|
| "Digital Manners Policies" is a marketing term. Let's call this what it
| really is: Selective Device Jamming. It's not polite, it's dangerous. It
| won't make anyone more secure -- or more polite.
`----

http://www.wired.com/politics/security/commentary/securitymatters/2008/06/securitymatters_0626


Microsoft could force your mobile into silence

,----[ Quote ]
| Microsoft is developing a new technology that could force mobiles into silent
| mode, or even prevent calls from being made.
|
| [...]
|
| Phone jammers, which work in small spaces, are banned in the UK and come with
| a hefty fine for use.
`----

http://www.techradar.com/news/phone-and-communications/microsoft-could-force-your-mobile-into-silence-393006


Digital copyright: it's all wrong

,----[ Quote ]
| The ACTA draft is a scary document. If a treaty based on its provisions were
| adopted, it would enable any border guard, in any treaty country, to check
| any electronic device for any content that they suspect infringes copyright
| laws. They need no proof, only suspicion.
|
| They would be able to seize any device - laptop, iPod, DVD recorder, mobile
| phone, etc - and confiscate it or destroy anything on it, merely on
| suspicion. On the spot, no lawyers, no right of appeal, no nothing.
`----

http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/news/technology/digital-copyright-its-all-wrong/2008/06/09/1212863783566.html?page=fullpage#contentSwap1
http://tinyurl.com/6ylvpx


Embattled ACTA Negotiations Next Week In Geneva; US Sees Signing This Year

,----[ Quote ]
| Criticism from NGOs
|
| Canadian law expert David Fewer, staff counsel at the University of Ottawaâs
| Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic, told the Ottawa Citizen
| that the discussion paper was very close to a potential Christmas wish-list
| by Hollywood companies.
|
| Knowledge Ecology International (KEI), in an earlier statement filed to USTR,
| warned against a lack in differentiation and clearness of core terms, like
| counterfeiting, infringement or piracy. âIs Microsoft a âpirateâ for
| insisting on the right to continue to infringe the z4 patents in order to use
| an infringing DRM technology to protect Microsoft software itself from
| infringement by unauthorised uses?â KEI asked in its statement.
`----

http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=1071
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkrKIlgACgkQU4xAY3RXLo7LsACeJat6M8jNlNixfCKGFg7RN3iX
gfQAnA9XfvSO7fk4wSD9UeTHr6YLCj/i
=c8BR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index