Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] Glimpse at Patent Trolls/Hoarders Shows USPTO is Broken

  • Subject: [News] Glimpse at Patent Trolls/Hoarders Shows USPTO is Broken
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 09:09:47 +0000
  • Followup-to: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • User-agent: KNode/4.3.1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

A Look Behind The Curtain: How A Patent Hoarder Makes Money

,----[ Quote ]
| A few months back, someone sent over some 
| details about a legal battle involving 
| Peter Boesen, who is both a convicted felon 
| in jail and a patent hoarder who licensed 
| his patents to a "patent troll" firm to 
| assert against tons of tech companies, and 
| Niro Scavone, the law firm representing the 
| patent company (and the law firm famous 
| for, among other things, having been the 
| inspiration for the term "patent troll").
`----

http://techdirt.com/articles/20091023/1856126663.shtml

Patent Litigation Weekly: Revealed! How Much Money a "Patent Troll" Makes

,----[ Quote ]
| Most intriguing is the sum paid by Apple to 
| settle an SPT suit brought over the iPhone 
| in the Eastern District of Texas in 2008: 
| $865,000. Without any motions being filed 
| after the intial complaint or any 
| substantive discovery, a bit more than 30 
| percent of that amount, $271,817, went to 
| Niro Scavone, which also billed $46,568 in 
| expenses. Nearly $40,000 went to someone 
| identified as "Ward"--most likely Johnny 
| Ward Jr., who served as local counsel to 
| SPT in the case. Of what was left, almost 
| $109,000 went to SP Technologies, then 
| owned by investor Courtney Sherrer, and 
| $311,400 went to Boesen. 
`----

http://thepriorart.typepad.com/the_prior_art/2009/10/how-much-money-a-patent-troll-makes-sp-technologies.html


Recent:

FSF files brief in Bilski case calling on the Supreme Court to eliminate software patents

,----[ Quote ]
| The Free Software Foundation (FSF) today submitted an amicus
| curiae brief calling on the Supreme Court to affirm that software
| ideas are not patentable. After outlining the positive impact that
| the free software movement and the GNU General Public License (GNU
| GPL) have had on computer use, the brief explains how software
| patents are an obstacle and a danger to software developers.
`----

http://www.fsf.org/news/bilski-supreme-court-brief


SFLC files Bilski brief: Software should not be patentable and don't forget the 1st Amendment

,----[ Quote ]
| The Software Freedom Law Center has now filed its brief in Bilski.
| You can read it online here, as well as download it as a PDF or as
| Postscript. It raises three major points: 1) software is just
| algorithms for computers in human readable terms, and algorithms
| are not patentable; 2) excluding software from patentable subject
| matter encourages innovation in software; and 3) the First
| Amendment prohibits permitting the patenting of abstract ideas. I
| think you'll find that last point the most interesting.
`----

http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20091002213301495
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkrmuNsACgkQU4xAY3RXLo4gmQCdGldxKMAZ7Q+reEbG29izasVY
p9wAoId7j/rPfgemJsRbARTuvMIdw0ce
=uHLF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index