-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Open vs. open vs. open: a model for public collaboration
,----[ Quote ]
| People and organizations who want to truly âgo
| openâ need to see this as a journey, one which
| will require that they change their methods of
| communication and decision-making, not just how
| their content is published. The extent to which
| they are able to fully embrace the open
| paradigm will determine the potential benefits
| to the project.
`----
http://mdzlog.alcor.net/2009/10/26/open-vs-open-vs-open-a-model-for-public-collaboration/
Recent:
What âOpenâ means to Microsoft
,----[ Quote ]
| Recent statements on âOpenâ give an interesting insight into Microsoft
| constancy.
|
| In a recent Computerworld UK blog entry, Glyn Moody takes Microsoftâs Jason
| Matusox to task for conflating âbalanceâ with âopenâ. I wonât re-hash the
| points Mr. Moody makes so read his article too!
|
| Basically, Mr. Matusox laments how Open standards are âoverbalancedâ in favor
| of standard implementors, and someone is insisting that standards must
| have âno IP restrictionsâ.
`----
http://www.the-source.com/2009/08/what-open-means-to-microsoft/
Related:
Using open source as a marketing ploy
,----[ Quote ]
| This is typical trend riding fluff. If you go the Aras website you
| read about "Microsoft Enterprise Open Source Solutions", which is
| comical in and of itself.
`----
http://weblog.infoworld.com/openresource/archives/2007/01/more_open_sourc.html
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkrn7owACgkQU4xAY3RXLo5XngCbB1VeC89FQuQyN1WwcerFIwrD
2yEAoJGbRH6UnfTBDC3XSPvXqTj+/mjq
=U0T7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|
