Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] Patent Site Published Article Against Software Patents

  • Subject: [News] Patent Site Published Article Against Software Patents
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2009 20:04:48 +0000
  • Followup-to: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • User-agent: KNode/4.3.1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Abandoning software patents?

,----[ Quote ]
| On Monday, November 9th, the Supreme Court 
| will hear the case of Bilski's business 
| method patent. Being the first review of 
| patentable subject matter since 1981, this 
| decision could make the rules for decades 
| to come. The court will review the 2008 
| ruling of the CAFC which created the 
| "particular machine or transformation" 
| test. This test, depending on who's reading 
| it, could significantly narrow the scope 
| for patenting software ideas.
| 
| The Supreme Court isn't obliged to rule on 
| the patentability of software ideas. 
| Bilski's patent is a business method 
| patent, not a software patent. So why might 
| the court make a broad ruling which would 
| cover software? For people who are already 
| aware of the legal arguments, I'd like to 
| offer a review of the socio-economic 
| arguments for abandoning software patents.
`----

http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/11/abandoning-software-patents.html

Highlights of the Briefs

http://www.softwarefreedom.org/resources/2009/bilski-resources.html

- From the Editors: Letâs hope for a court ruling writ large

http://www.sdtimes.com/FROM_THE_EDITORS_LET_S_HOPE_FOR_A_COURT_RULING_WRIT_LARGE/By_SD_TIMES_EDITORIAL_BOARD/About_PATENTS_and_JAVA_and_ORACLE/33879

ACLU/PUBPAT Gene Patent Challenge Moves Ahead

,----[ Quote ]
| A federal district court said that the ACLU 
| et al. suit challenging the patentability 
| of gene patents can go forward. The 
| American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), the 
| Public Patent Foundation (PUBPAT), and a 
| whole host of others have filed a lawsuit 
| challenging patents on two human genes 
| associated with breast and ovarian cancer 
| claiming that the patents are illegal and 
| restrict both scientific research and 
| patientsâ access to medical care, and that 
| patents on human genes violate the First 
| Amendment and patent law because genes are 
| âproducts of nature.â
`----

http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2009/11/03/aclupubpat-gene-patent-challenge-moves-ahead/

Court Upholds Rights of Scientists and Patients to Challenge Gene Patents

,----[ Quote ]
| "We hope this challenge is the beginning of 
| the end to patents on genes, which limit 
| scientific research, learning and the free 
| flow of information," said Chris Hansen, a 
| staff attorney with the ACLU First 
| Amendment Working Group. "No one should be 
| able to patent a part of the human body."
`----

http://scienceblogs.com/culturedish/2009/11/court_upholds_rights_of_scient.php

EU Community Patent: The Mill Goes On And On

,----[ Quote ]
| With other words, the highly crucial 
| question of the arrangement concerning 
| translations - which might well be decisive 
| for the fate of the entire project - is 
| taken out of the main body of text on the 
| Council Regulation on the Community Patent. 
| As far as I can learn from earlier 
| Documents, utilisation of machine 
| translations is considered to be the joker 
| of the day. The newly introduced Article 61 
| makes clear that if this approach should 
| later turn to be unworkable, the language 
| arrangement can be changed without 
| unbundling the entire package of the EU 
| Community patent project.
`----

http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/index.php?/archives/130-EU-Community-Patent-The-Mill-Goes-On-And-On.html


Recent:

Richard Stallman on Software Patents

,----[ Quote ]
| In this insightful discussion, international Free Software
| advocate Richard Stallman (RMS) will argue that software
| patents seriously and significantly obstruct software
| development.
|
| Software patents are patents that cover software ideas.
| Stallman will argue that they restrict the development of
| software to the point that the risk of legal action as a
| result of design decisions is dramatically raised. Stallman
| will also make the point that patents in other fields
| restrict factories, but in IT, software patents restrict
| every computer user and consumer.
`----

http://www.nzcs.org.nz/events/waikato_bop/70-Richard_Stallman_on_Software_Patents
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkr3JGAACgkQU4xAY3RXLo6rmQCffnyIYPNnwnh4cleZCirFJz83
ZtAAn1BTxkEZXsGOw7p+dtxslf0B6vp6
=uMRQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index