Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] Bilski Case Seems Likely to be Won by Kappos

  • Subject: [News] Bilski Case Seems Likely to be Won by Kappos
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:17:20 +0000
  • Followup-to: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • User-agent: KNode/4.3.1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Supreme Skepticism Over Bilski Claims Puts Method Patents on Shaky Ground

,----[ Quote ]
| For the first time in almost 30 years, the 
| U.S. Supreme Court on Monday considered the 
| issue of what types of technology should be 
| eligible for patent protection when it heard 
| oral arguments in Bilski v. Kappos.
`----

http://www.law.com/jsp/iplawandbusiness/PubArticleIPLB.jsp?id=1202435308131

Justices Show Supreme Skepticism About Broad Business Model Patents

http://techdirt.com/articles/20091110/0111136865.shtml

Bilski oral argument highlights (or rather, lowlights...)

http://www.againstmonopoly.org/index.php?perm=593056000000001847


Recent:

FSF files brief in Bilski case calling on the Supreme Court to eliminate software patents

,----[ Quote ]
| The Free Software Foundation (FSF) today submitted an amicus
| curiae brief calling on the Supreme Court to affirm that software
| ideas are not patentable. After outlining the positive impact that
| the free software movement and the GNU General Public License (GNU
| GPL) have had on computer use, the brief explains how software
| patents are an obstacle and a danger to software developers.
`----

http://www.fsf.org/news/bilski-supreme-court-brief


SFLC files Bilski brief: Software should not be patentable and don't forget the 1st Amendment

,----[ Quote ]
| The Software Freedom Law Center has now filed its brief in Bilski.
| You can read it online here, as well as download it as a PDF or as
| Postscript. It raises three major points: 1) software is just
| algorithms for computers in human readable terms, and algorithms
| are not patentable; 2) excluding software from patentable subject
| matter encourages innovation in software; and 3) the First
| Amendment prohibits permitting the patenting of abstract ideas. I
| think you'll find that last point the most interesting.
`----

http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20091002213301495
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkr6gSAACgkQU4xAY3RXLo4RYACgjtXm+UbrnBx2dVbt43XpX+BP
SVkAnRQF6OivWYrPipNBrwk6YeXMw51l
=JUkC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index