-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
____/ Megabyte on Sunday 22 Nov 2009 21:44 : \____
> On 09-11-22 2:38 PM, in article
> reply_in_group-86560F.13383222112009@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Tim Smith"
> <reply_in_group@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> In article <nemo-22112009100651@xxxxxxxx>,
>> Megabyte <Megabyte.NoSPAM@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> I think one of the biggest things the Obama government could do for
>>> open sourse is to adopt open standards, specifically ODF. They could
>>> implement it at little cost using the SUN plug-in for Office and it
>>> would allow them to consider alternative office suites in the future.
>>> By going this route they don't lock MS out but rather encourage them to
>>> play nice and use open standards.
>>
>> How exactly is ODF more open than OOXML?
>
> By the fact that it was not forced through standards bodies making a mockery
> of the entire standards setting process like OOXML.
"Tim" is trying a revisionist approach.
- --
~~ Best of wishes
Roy S. Schestowitz | Disclaimer: no SCO code used to generate this post
http://Schestowitz.com | GNU/Linux | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Mem: 2075800k total, 1660792k used, 415008k free, 12460k buffers
http://iuron.com - next generation of search paradigms
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAksJum0ACgkQU4xAY3RXLo5DuQCZAWfCKuFEWDOgOX3anD8g24s7
W4IAnj9qJdsaS+uvNvloiOU4b92TFt/P
=ukn5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|