Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: [News] Apple Abuse with DRM, DMCA Still a Nightmare

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

____/ Mark Kent on Saturday 09 Jan 2010 11:20 : \____

> 
> 
> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>>
>>
>>
>> ____/ Mark Kent on Tuesday 05 Jan 2010 09:04 : \____
>>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> A look at Apple's love for DRM and consumer lock-ins
>>>>
>>>> ,----[ Quote ]
>>>>| Apple makes great productsâyou'll get no
>>>>| argument from us. But Apple also likes
>>>>| keeping tight control over those products,
>>>>| and if anyone outside of Apple's blessed
>>>>| circle attempts to get in, the company is
>>>>| more than willing to try to use (or abuse)
>>>>| the law to its advantage.
>>>> `----
>>>>
>>>> http://arstechnica.com/apple/news/2010/01/a-look-at-apples-love-for-drm-and-consumer-lock-ins.ars
>>>>
>>> 
>>>> Tough To Punish Those Who File Bogus DMCA Takedowns
>>>>
>>>> ,----[ Quote ]
>>>>| Eric Goldman highlights a case where an ISP
>>>>| tried to use section (f) to go after a
>>>>| bunch of folks who issued questionable DMCA
>>>>| takedowns that were clearly designed to
>>>>| harass a couple of websites (and, at one
>>>>| point, were used to try to take down the
>>>>| entire ISP). The details are a bit
>>>>| convoluted, but basically, a group of
>>>>| people critical of what was being said on a
>>>>| website issued a series of DMCA takedowns
>>>>| to keep the site down every time it came
>>>>| back up following a counternotice. This
>>>>| seems like a perfect case where the
>>>>| takedown issuers should be hit with
>>>>| sanctions of some sort, but the case was
>>>>| dismissed on procedural grounds instead,
>>>>| which seem to be based on a
>>>>| misunderstanding of the DMCA itself.
>>>> `----
>>>>
>>>> http://techdirt.com/articles/20091231/1224117567.shtml
>>>>
>>> 
>>> Wasn't this always the intention of the DMCA?  It was to put power to
>>> "copyright owners" so that they could harass "violators" whilst the
>>> legal system went through its process.
>>> 
>>> It should never have made the statute books.
>>
>> The ACTA would spread DMCA to _all_ countries, even the few that rejected the
>> beast.
>>
> 
> We should not permit companies with vested interests in such things be
> able to drive the legal system.  It's like having Monsanto driving
> patents on genetics, say.

They already do that, so farmers took it to Germany's streets.

ACTA is a conspiracy of wealthy companies bribing and corrupting
politicians for their wishlist to become law. A year ago it was 
scarcely known, but public pressure (Wikileaks) forced them to fold.

- -- 
		~~ Best of wishes


Object-oriented design is the roman numerals of computing. -- Rob Pike
http://Schestowitz.com  |  GNU is Not UNIX  |     PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
roy      pts/0        :0               Tue Jan  5 20:17   still logged in   
      http://iuron.com - proposing a non-profit search engine
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAktJvEoACgkQU4xAY3RXLo5dMQCfey9AXAEms8fby+dkNlV+a+85
hMkAn3sjGRPP3FxEtUS0Wg41+S1M71QW
=dcUs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index