Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Harvard Business Review: Microsoft's Ballmer ranks low as CEO

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

____/ Rex Ballard on Wednesday 13 Jan 2010 19:42 : \____

> On Jan 13, 2:07 pm, nessuno <nessuno7...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> <Quote>
>> The Harvard Busines Review just published an analysis of the top 100
>> CEOs in the world, and the results don't bode well for Microsoft.
>> Steve Ballmer didn't even make the list, while Apple's Steve Jobs
>> topped it at number 1.
> </Quote>
> 
> One of they key considerations was market cap change.  Bill left just
> as Vista was being released, there was lots of speculation on how
> great it would be, which drove the price up, and therefore the
> capitalization.  Bill went out on a high note.  Steve had to deal with
> the reality of a failed release which was rejected by corporate
> customers, increasing pressure from Apple, Linux, and Open Source
> software that was threatening revenue streams such as Microsoft Office
> and SQL Server.  At the same time, he had to make some huge
> concessions to netbook producers in order to get them to replace Linux
> with Windows on the machines that were displayed in the retail
> stores.  Add to that the bankruptcies of Gateway, Circuit City,
> CompUSA, and the rise of Acer and ASUS, who had created their own
> markets without Microsoft for over 10 years.
> 
> Ballmer also didn't have access to the brilliant mind of Bill Gates II
> (the rich kid's rich father).
> 
> Worse yet, Steve Ballmer tried to hide the losses by cashing in
> receivables, and other "shell games" that were barely legal.  It was
> very transparent, and often a few hours after the headlines showed
> Microsoft with huge gains, the investors started selling because they
> could see the huge losses.
> 
> Steve has also worn very thin on the OEMs who are now demanding more
> concessions in order to keep their PC divisions afloat.
> 
> Add to that a big fat recession, lack of available credit, and other
> disincentives, and it's easy to see why Steve didn't make the list.
> 
>> http://blogs.computerworld.com/15292/harvard_business_review_microsof...
> 
> http://hbr.org/2010/01/the-best-performing-ceos-in-the-world/ar/1

Microsoft is playing the "blame Ballmer" game (good cop, bad cop), but Gates
too is responsible for failures and crimes; they not only happened under his watch; he
_invoked_ many of them, as internal correspondence reveals.

- -- 
		~~ Best of wishes


NT is 'more secure' in so far as, if your average cracker screws around with
it very much, a NT system tends to remove itself from the network rather
promptly. -- ?, some CERT guy
http://Schestowitz.com  |  Open Prospects   |     PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Tasks: 140 total,   1 running, 139 sleeping,   0 stopped,   0 zombie
      http://iuron.com - knowledge engine, not a search engine
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAktOhW4ACgkQU4xAY3RXLo554QCfVEzEzyLjDNMtYE+epieyI4MD
WUYAoI1gZZtHGVeKcETjEl3iiMSKfFIz
=Yjb1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index