Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] LinuxCon 2010 Targets Linux, But "GNU/Linux" is Important

  • Subject: [News] LinuxCon 2010 Targets Linux, But "GNU/Linux" is Important
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 09:26:24 +0000
  • Followup-to: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • User-agent: KNode/4.3.1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

LinuxCon 2010 Call for Papers

,----[ Quote ]
| The Linux Foundation has announced that the 
| Call for Papers deadline for LinuxCon 2010 
| will be the 31st of March. Registration for 
| the non-profit organisation's second annual 
| conference, which will take place from the 
| 10th to the 12th of August, 2010 in Boston 
| Massachusetts,  is now open. Jim Zemlin, 
| executive director of The Linux Foundation 
| said that, âLinuxCon has quickly become the 
| destination for collaborating in person on all 
| matters Linux".
`----

http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/LinuxCon-2010-Call-for-Papers-921124.html

There's nothing wrong with being thankful (or why I say GNU/Linux)

,----[ Quote ]
| For example, simplicity for newcomers: What 
| about when you have a distro that doesn't have 
| Linux inside of it? Say, Debian's hurd or 
| kFreeBSD or NetBSD ports? Those are distros, 
| but Linux is not to be found inside cause it 
| (the kernel) has been replaced for another 
| kernel. What are we gonna call them? Debian 
| Non-Linux? Go figure how you will explain that 
| to newcomers ("sure... it's Debian Linux... 
| but it has no linux... yet it is linux". 
| Priceless).
| 
| Some people have said that it's out of 
| Stallman's big ego that he wants everybody to 
| call it GNU. Well, I think Stallman hits the 
| nail (at least on the funny part) when he says 
| that "sure... and that's why I ask people to 
| call it Stallmanix". So I think it's not out 
| of ego... but maybe if he had named the OS 
| Stallmanix in the first place, we wouldn't be 
| having this argument as it (too) is more 
| catchy than GNU. :-)
`----

http://maratux.blogspot.com/2010/01/theres-nothing-wrong-with-being.html


Recent:

The Wikipedia "Naming Controversy" by Joshua Gay

,----[ Quote ]
| On the English version of Wikipedia there is an article that discusses the
| naming controversy over whether one should call the operating
| system âGNU/Linuxâ or âLinux.â In that article, some contend that Linux is
| the more popular and common name for the system. But when writing an
| encyclopedia, neither popularity nor commonality are the paramount concerns.
| Calling the system âGNU/Linuxâ is more factually accurate, as the GNU project
| largely forms the base of all distributions of the operating system. For
| example, GNU packages accounts for 14.79% of the 16.5GB of source packages
| used to build the Main repository of the gNewSense GNU/Linux distribution
| (deltad). They also constitute 6.69% of the 27GBs of source packages from
| which the Universe repository is built. Linux weighs in at about 253MB and
| accounts for approximately 1.5% of the source code needed to build the Main
| repository. Furthermore, Linux itself is generally built using GNU libraries
| and GNU tools, and on many systems depends on them being there.
`----

http://exploringfreedom.org/2008/07/17/the-wikipedia-naming-controversy-by-joshua-gay/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAktqksAACgkQU4xAY3RXLo6saQCggD/pm5g/zAKEKkBc44i65793
bPkAn3HaLEDEGHDADO2TQbzvg/snLNE0
=tzWi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index