Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] Benjamin Mako Hill Explains That FSF is About Freedom, Not Just Software

  • Subject: [News] Benjamin Mako Hill Explains That FSF is About Freedom, Not Just Software
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 21:11:43 +0000
  • Followup-to: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • User-agent: KNode/4.3.1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Benjamin Mako Hillâs FSF Appeal

,----[ Quote ]
| Since one of my main areas of interest is the 
| conflicting intersection of Free Software and 
| Open Source, Mr. Hillâs thoughts are often 
| very illuminating for me â even when I donât 
| agree with him I never feel like he makes his 
| argument poorly.
| 
| In his FSF appeal, Iâm glad to say Mr. Hill 
| delivers and makes a point I am in strong 
| agreement with:
| 
|     Free software is not really about 
|     software in this fundamental sense; itâs 
|     about bringing freedom to users through 
|     software.
| 
| Just like open source is necessary but not 
| sufficient for Free Software, Free Software 
| in turn is necessary but not sufficient for 
| âusers to take control of their technologyâ.
`----

http://www.the-source.com/2010/02/benjamin-mako-hills-fsf-appeal-2/

Antifeatures

http://wiki.mako.cc/Antifeatures

"DRM is the future."

                                --Steve Ballmer, Microsoft CEO

Recent:

Okular and DRM

,----[ Quote ]
| Jonathan Corbet wrote a piece on LWN about Okular and it's implementation of
| user permission restrictions in PDFs (sometimes errantly refered to
| as "DRM"). This is actually something it has done since it was KPDF back in
| KDE 3. Obviously, permissions in PDFs are a generally misguided attempt at
| protecting the agenda of a publisher in a demonstrably ineffective way that
| comes at a cost to things like the concepts of fair use.
|
| So what's up with Okular having support for permissions? It's quite simple:
| not only is permissions in the PDF spec, but there are organizations in the
| world who, for contractual or legal reasons, require permissions in PDFs be
| respected.
|
| Do we simply not serve those users needs? Do we "know better" for the user
| who says "I want to accept the terms of the publisher of this document"? Of
| course not; that's rather user unfriendly in itself.
|
| So the strategy adopted was quite simple: make it an option that the user may
| choose to abide by the permissions flags in a PDF or not.
`----

http://aseigo.blogspot.com/2009/06/okular-and-drm.html


Related:

The Longest Suicide Note in History

,----[ Quote ]
| On the same podcast Gutmann scotched suggestions Microsoft were held
| to ransom by Hollywood;
|
| [...]
|
| The genie's out of the bottle before the operating system has even
| been released! But that doesn't mean Vista users in particular - and
| the computer community at large - won't end up paying for Microsoft's
| DRM folly. At the risk of repeating myself repeating myself, yet
| another reason to move to Linux.
`----

http://blogs.pcworld.co.nz/pcworld/tux-love/2007/01/the_longest_suicide_note_in_hi.html
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAktzIQ8ACgkQU4xAY3RXLo6mGgCfQionyHMXsSB7vSEctZMm/8St
EgoAoKR/EJoOeGP9sFRz1ICLE9eTd+Sb
=g8Yz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index